Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There are many highly qualified professionals from different parts of the
world, men and women, there should be no compromise with the quality of
candidates if they are selected considering their kowledge, background and
experience.
Olga

2010/2/6 Caroline Greer <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>

>  I am less convinced. I definitely think that best efforts should be made
> to acheive geographic and gender representation but not if that compromises
> the quality of candidates which is paramount.
>
> SOs should be encouraged to think about diversity but ultimately, the
> Selectors make that particular call, no?
>
> Kind regards
>
> ----------------
> Caroline Greer
> Director of Policy
> dotMobi
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: zahid@xxxxxxxxx <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <
> owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sat Feb 06 12:55:14 2010
> Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of
> AoC Review Team Volunteers
>
> I also agree with Rafik.
> Regards
> Olga
>
>
>
>
> 2010/2/6 Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>         I do think Rafik makes a valid point.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         Sincerely,
>
>         Zahid Jamil
>         Barrister-at-law
>         Jamil & Jamil
>         Barristers-at-law
>         219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
>         Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
>         Cell: +923008238230
>         Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
>         Fax: +92 21 5655026
>         www.jamilandjamil.com
>
>         Notice / Disclaimer
>         This message contains confidential information and its contents are
> being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the
> intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
> e-mail.
>         Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
> this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above
> may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil,
> Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by
> attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment,
> modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including
> photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not
> transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without
> prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
>
>
>         Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>
> ________________________________
>
>         From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
>         Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:12:05 +0900
>         To: Gomes, Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>         Cc: <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>         Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO
> endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
>
>         Hi Chuck,
>
>         I don't think that we can compromise in that point as the ongoing
> internationalization of ICANN is critical and I guess that is subject to
> accountability too.
>         with a real constraint, we may urge SGs to involve their members
> from less-represented regions.
>         the same case may happen somehow for gender balance too.
>
>         Regards
>
>         Rafik
>
>         2010/2/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>                 Thanks Rafik.  How would you suggest changing the process?
> The proposed wording is: "No more than two volunteers should come from the
> same geographical region."  The key word is "should"; that was intentional
> because if there are not qualified, volunteers from enough geographic
> regions, what would we do?  The goal would be to not have more that two from
> any one region, but that may not be achievable.
>
>                 Chuck
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>                         From: Rafik Dammak 
> [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx<rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
> ]
>                         Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:03 AM
>
>                         To: Gomes, Chuck
>                         Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>                         Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process
> for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
>
>
>
>
>                         Hi Chuck,
>
>
>
>                                  "have less than three geographic regions
> represented. ".
>
>
>
>                         I am uncomfortable with this point because in
> practice some regions wasn't enough represented and this will allow the
> status quo for RT.
>
>                         if it is not late, no objection for extension.
>
>                         Regards
>
>                         rafik
>
>
>
>