Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers

["Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am less convinced. I definitely think that best efforts should be made to 
acheive geographic and gender representation but not if that compromises the 
quality of candidates which is paramount. 

SOs should be encouraged to think about diversity but ultimately, the Selectors 
make that particular call, no? 

Kind regards 

----------------
Caroline Greer
Director of Policy 
dotMobi 


----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
To: zahid@xxxxxxxxx <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
<owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat Feb 06 12:55:14 2010
Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC 
Review Team Volunteers

I also agree with Rafik.
Regards
Olga




2010/2/6 Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>


        I do think Rafik makes a valid point.
        
        
        

        
        
        Sincerely,
        
        Zahid Jamil
        Barrister-at-law
        Jamil & Jamil
        Barristers-at-law
        219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
        Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
        Cell: +923008238230
        Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
        Fax: +92 21 5655026
        www.jamilandjamil.com
        
        Notice / Disclaimer
        This message contains confidential information and its contents are 
being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the 
intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
        Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received 
this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may 
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and 
constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.
        
        
        Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

________________________________

        From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> 
        Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:12:05 +0900
        To: Gomes, Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        Cc: <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
        Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO 
endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers

        Hi Chuck,

        I don't think that we can compromise in that point as the ongoing 
internationalization of ICANN is critical and I guess that is subject to 
accountability too.
        with a real constraint, we may urge SGs to involve their members from 
less-represented regions.  
        the same case may happen somehow for gender balance too.

        Regards

        Rafik

        2010/2/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        

                Thanks Rafik.  How would you suggest changing the process?  The 
proposed wording is: "No more than two volunteers should come from the same 
geographical region."  The key word is "should"; that was intentional because 
if there are not qualified, volunteers from enough geographic regions, what 
would we do?  The goal would be to not have more that two from any one region, 
but that may not be achievable.
                 
                Chuck


________________________________

                        From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx] 
                        Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:03 AM

                        To: Gomes, Chuck
                        Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
                        Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for 
GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
                        
                        
                        

                        Hi Chuck, 



                                 "have less than three geographic regions 
represented. ".
                                 


                        I am uncomfortable with this point because in practice 
some regions wasn't enough represented and this will allow the status quo for 
RT. 

                        if it is not late, no objection for extension.

                        Regards

                        rafik