Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
- To: <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
- From: "Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 13:10:42 -0000
I am less convinced. I definitely think that best efforts should be made to
acheive geographic and gender representation but not if that compromises the
quality of candidates which is paramount.
SOs should be encouraged to think about diversity but ultimately, the Selectors
make that particular call, no?
Director of Policy
----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
To: zahid@xxxxxxxxx <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
<owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Sent: Sat Feb 06 12:55:14 2010
Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC
Review Team Volunteers
I also agree with Rafik.
2010/2/6 Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
I do think Rafik makes a valid point.
Jamil & Jamil
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are
being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the
intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and
constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil &
Jamil is prohibited.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:12:05 +0900
To: Gomes, Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO
endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
I don't think that we can compromise in that point as the ongoing
internationalization of ICANN is critical and I guess that is subject to
with a real constraint, we may urge SGs to involve their members from
the same case may happen somehow for gender balance too.
2010/2/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Rafik. How would you suggest changing the process? The
proposed wording is: "No more than two volunteers should come from the same
geographical region." The key word is "should"; that was intentional because
if there are not qualified, volunteers from enough geographic regions, what
would we do? The goal would be to not have more that two from any one region,
but that may not be achievable.
From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:03 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for
GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
"have less than three geographic regions
I am uncomfortable with this point because in practice
some regions wasn't enough represented and this will allow the status quo for
if it is not late, no objection for extension.