Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Caroline,
you make a good point, to know if they step forward or not, a call for
volunteers can be released and then we will have a sense of the amount of
candidates and their regions, gender and qualifications.
Regards
Olga

2010/2/6 Caroline Greer <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>

>  Of course quality candidates, male and female from across the globe,
> exist. But my point is that we don't want to find ourselves in a
> straitjacket if they choose not to step forward. The review process is a
> very onerous task to take on and there may be less candidates presenting
> themselves than we think. Therefore, I feel it is best to set diversity
> guidelines only at the SO level.
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
> ----------------
> Caroline Greer
> Director of Policy
> dotMobi
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Caroline Greer
> Cc: zahid@xxxxxxxxx <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>; rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx <
> rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>; owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <
> owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sat Feb 06 13:49:42 2010
> Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of
> AoC Review Team Volunteers
>
> There are many highly qualified professionals from different parts of the
> world, men and women, there should be no compromise with the quality of
> candidates if they are selected considering their kowledge, background and
> experience.
> Olga
>
>
> 2010/2/6 Caroline Greer <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>         I am less convinced. I definitely think that best efforts should be
> made to acheive geographic and gender representation but not if that
> compromises the quality of candidates which is paramount.
>
>         SOs should be encouraged to think about diversity but ultimately,
> the Selectors make that particular call, no?
>
>         Kind regards
>
>         ----------------
>         Caroline Greer
>         Director of Policy
>         dotMobi
>
>
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>         To: zahid@xxxxxxxxx <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
>         Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>;
> owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; Gomes, Chuck <
> cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>         Sent: Sat Feb 06 12:55:14 2010
>         Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO
> endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
>
>         I also agree with Rafik.
>         Regards
>         Olga
>
>
>
>
>         2010/2/6 Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>                 I do think Rafik makes a valid point.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                 Sincerely,
>
>                 Zahid Jamil
>                 Barrister-at-law
>                 Jamil & Jamil
>                 Barristers-at-law
>                 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
>                 Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
>                 Cell: +923008238230
>                 Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
>                 Fax: +92 21 5655026
>                 www.jamilandjamil.com
>
>                 Notice / Disclaimer
>                 This message contains confidential information and its
> contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you
> are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or
> copy this e-mail.
>                 Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have
> received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The
> contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil,
> Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by
> attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment,
> modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including
> photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not
> transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without
> prior written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
>
>
>                 Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
>
>         ________________________________
>
>                 From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
>                 Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:12:05 +0900
>                 To: Gomes, Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>                 Cc: <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>                 Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for
> GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
>
>                 Hi Chuck,
>
>                 I don't think that we can compromise in that point as the
> ongoing internationalization of ICANN is critical and I guess that is
> subject to accountability too.
>                 with a real constraint, we may urge SGs to involve their
> members from less-represented regions.
>                 the same case may happen somehow for gender balance too.
>
>                 Regards
>
>                 Rafik
>
>                 2010/2/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>                         Thanks Rafik.  How would you suggest changing the
> process?  The proposed wording is: "No more than two volunteers should come
> from the same geographical region."  The key word is "should"; that was
> intentional because if there are not qualified, volunteers from enough
> geographic regions, what would we do?  The goal would be to not have more
> that two from any one region, but that may not be achievable.
>
>                         Chuck
>
>
>         ________________________________
>
>                                 From: Rafik Dammak [
> mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]
>                                 Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:03 AM
>
>                                 To: Gomes, Chuck
>                                 Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>                                 Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a
> process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
>
>
>
>
>                                 Hi Chuck,
>
>
>
>                                          "have less than three geographic
> regions represented. ".
>
>
>
>                                 I am uncomfortable with this point because
> in practice some regions wasn't enough represented and this will allow the
> status quo for RT.
>
>                                 if it is not late, no objection for
> extension.
>
>                                 Regards
>
>                                 rafik
>
>
>
>
>
>
>