<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Group call?
- To: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Group call?
- From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:51:08 +0100
Chuck, Olga,
Thanks for offering. This has to be done Wednesday 10th. As I say I should
have wifi access depending on the rooms we're in and the whims of the UN's
crack staff, in which case I can help, but I can't promise to handle lead
drafting and coordination.
BD
On Feb 6, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Olga Cavalli wrote:
> Bill,
> I am able to help you, the only inconvenience is that I am travelling to
> Tokyo on Thrusday and I will be several hours on planes and without
> connectivity.
> Regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/2/5 William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Feb 5, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
>> I think it would be very helpful considering our very short time frame,
>> assuming Bill can do it. We need to finalize a proposal for the Council by
>> Wednesday.
>>
>> Glen - Would you or Gisella please do a Doodle for this?
>>
>> Chuck
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm very sorry, but as this has moved more slowly than expected I'm afraid my
> schedule's now going to be a problem at this end. I have must-do meetings at
> the UN all day Sunday-Tuesday, except for a couple hours Monday afternoon.
> If Doodle reveals that a call Monday between 15:00-18:00 CET works for others
> then I could join, but the only time I'm going to have to contribute to any
> focused writing of text would be tomorrow Saturday and then Wednesday. Re:
> Saturday I'm not clear what I could write at this point as a) we are awaiting
> clarification of the timeline, which may affect the advisability of different
> formulas for both qualifications and the procedures for soliciting/processing
> applications, and b) we've not had a lot of discussion on these points
> yielding a clear consensus. Re: Wednesday, being six hours ahead of EST
> helps somewhat, but as any text will need to be batted back and forth and
> agreed, waiting until then for anything more than last edits seems
> problematic.
>
> That being the case, in the key Sunday-Tuesday period someone else may have
> to coordinate the aggregation of inputs and tweaking of consensus text.
> Assuming the wifi works in the meeting rooms I can turn off my headphones
> sometimes and try to help, but that's about it. Is anyone willing and able
> to step in then?
>
> So how far down field can we push the ball tomorrow? Re: qualifications,
> Chuck and Kristina have suggested some possible additional qualifications to
> those set forth in the call for applications. I would note that if ICANN
> announces on Monday that applicants have another week, i.e. due the 24th
> instead of the 17th, and we adopt a bunch of GNSO-specific requirements on
> the 18th, it will be pretty important to ensure that everyone who may be
> working on an app gets fully apprised quickly, as they won't have much time.
> To be honest, I can imagine problem scenarios and wonder about the efficacy
> of setting additional requirements for this first, somewhat experimental RT
> process. But if everyone else feels strongly that we need these, ok.
>
> Re: process, Chuck has proposed a framework in his 2 Feb message, inter alia
> with the council forming a rating team of one Councilor from each SG plus one
> NCA, top ranked applicants then needing a simple majority vote of each house,
> and the council ultimately endorsing up to six. We'd need to flesh this out
> a bit. And Rafik has raised concerns about Chuck's suggestion re:
> geographical diversity, I raised a question as to whether the each applicant
> should have to get a majority of each house, and Caroline and Tim suggested
> we we should let each SG do their own internal process. Here too I'm not
> clear from the responses what the level of consensus is, but it's the end of
> a long day and I'm groggy and probably missing something.
>
> Anyway, if we could have more discussion around these two bits and identify
> points of consensus I can try to do something tomorrow, or conspire if
> someone wants to collaborate.
>
> Best,
>
> Bill
>
>
>
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|