Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Summary of where we are

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,
I inserted my comments IN CAPS and I indicated a small part of the text that
I suggest to delete.
Talk to you later.
Regards
Olga

2010/2/7 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  The attached MS Word document contains the following:
>
>    1. *AoC DT Action Plan for Development of GNSO Endorsement of RT
>    Volunteers*
>    2. *Proposed One-Time Process for GNSO Endorsement of AoC
>    Accountability & Transparency Review Team Volunteers*
>    3. *Proposed Qualifications*
>
> Items 1 & 2 are for the most part the same as what I previously sent to the
> list as a suggested plan forward with a few updates, some additions and
> comments and restructuring to make it easier to reference and discuss.  In
> item 3 I listed the ICANN AoC qualifications and added the four GNSO
> qualifications I suggested along with Kristina's suggestions for data
> needed.
>
> My hope is that this will facilitate our discussion on the list and in the
> pending teleconference call.
>
> It might be helpful if everyone could respond on the list to the following:
>
>    - Regarding item 1, does everyone agree with the action plan?  If not,
>    please suggest changes.
>    - Regarding item 2, there has been quite a lot of discussion
>    on geographic representation, so I encourage specific suggestions for
>    change.
>    - Regarding item 3, is their concensus on the item j information to be
>    requested from candidates?  If not, please suggest edits.  We will need to
>    discuss the other qualifications a lot more.
>
> Hope this is helpful.  All of it can be changed, but we need to do so very
> quickly because we have to produce a final proposal by Wednesday, 10 Feb.
>
> Chuck
>

Attachment: AoC Accountability & Transparency Review Team One-Time GNSO Endorsement Process - Draft 1 oc.doc
Description: MS-Word document