RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Summary of where we are
- To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Summary of where we are
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:21:28 -0500
Thanks Wolf. What do you mean by "we're looking for people capable to assess
whether the processes implemented so far can meet the AoC requirements"? What
"processes implemented so far"? Are you saying that the GNSO should not add to
the AoC requirements in its endorsement process?
From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 7:06 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Summary of where we are
Thanks Chuck for this briefing to which I generally agree.
I've inserted one comment only with regards to the GNSO qualification
As I understand the reviews we're looking for people capable to assess
whether the processes implemented so far can meet the AoC requirements.
Regarding regional and gender diversity I could agree to your
Deutsche Telekom AG
Head Office T-Home
Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 140, 53113 Bonn, Germany
+49 2244 873999 (Phone)
+49 2244 873955 (Fax)
+49 151 1452 5867 (Mobile)
Life is for sharing.
Deutsche Telekom AG
Supervisory Board: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Chairman)
Board of Management: René Obermann (Chairman),
Hamid Akhavan, Dr. Manfred Balz, Reinhard Clemens, Niek Jan van Damme,
Timotheus Höttges, Guido Kerkhoff, Thomas Sattelberger
Commercial register: Local court Bonn HRB 6794
Registered office: Bonn
WEEE reg. no. DE50478376
Von: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Februar 2010 16:07
Betreff: [gnso-arr-dt] Summary of where we are
The attached MS Word document contains the following:
1. AoC DT Action Plan for Development of GNSO Endorsement of RT
2. Proposed One-Time Process for GNSO Endorsement of AoC
Accountability & Transparency Review Team Volunteers
3. Proposed Qualifications
Items 1 & 2 are for the most part the same as what I previously sent to
the list as a suggested plan forward with a few updates, some additions and
comments and restructuring to make it easier to reference and discuss. In item
3 I listed the ICANN AoC qualifications and added the four GNSO qualifications
I suggested along with Kristina's suggestions for data needed.
My hope is that this will facilitate our discussion on the list and in
the pending teleconference call.
It might be helpful if everyone could respond on the list to the
* Regarding item 1, does everyone agree with the action plan? If
not, please suggest changes.
* Regarding item 2, there has been quite a lot of discussion on
geographic representation, so I encourage specific suggestions for change.
* Regarding item 3, is their concensus on the item j information
to be requested from candidates? If not, please suggest edits. We will need
to discuss the other qualifications a lot more.
Hope this is helpful. All of it can be changed, but we need to do so
very quickly because we have to produce a final proposal by Wednesday, 10 Feb.