[gnso-arr-dt] RE: Two documents attached

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

When you see all the redlining, you may think I didn't do a very good
job of cleaning these documents up.  If you would rather see clean
versions, please accept all the edits. My edits should appear in a
different color than Bill's. 

Note that the due dates have been changed a little.  There should be an
ICANN announcement today extending the deadline for applications for
volunteers for the A&T DT to 22 Feb. and giving us until 1 March to
provide our endorsements.  I set a goal of Friday, 26 March for
finalizing our endorsements to try to avoid getting into the week of 1
March when people will begin traveling to Nairobi.  If needed, we may
need Monday, 1 March if we cannot reach consensus on final endorsements
on 26 February.

Setting aside for a moment item 5 of the proposed process (i.e., the
second document), are there any concerns about any other elements of
either document.  In other words, can we say that we have reached
consensus on everything except item 5 of the process?

As you can see by my comment on item 5 of the proposed process, we
probably need to work on it more in the next 24 hours.  Please make
efforts to discuss this on the list, including proposed solutions.

Thanks for the all the time on this.

Chuck  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:54 PM
> To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Gomes, Chuck
> Subject: Two documents attached
> 
> Hi
> 
> I separated the internal plan from the procedural doc we will 
> have to approve in Council and then distribute externally.  
> On the first, there are a number of known unknowables about 
> the time line that popped up as I was looking at it.  I have 
> to run to another meeting, so Chuck has kindly offered to 
> clean this up after clarifying timing matters with Marco.  
> Chuck, when you've got that clear, could you please ask staff 
> to prepare whatever communication is needed Wednesday?
> 
> On the latter, I believe I've taken on board the points 
> people raised on the call, and cleaned up the language a tad. 
>  Unless I'm missing something, the main things we need to 
> decide by Wednesday pertain to points 6 and 7.  Thoughts?
> 
> Must go,
> 
> Bill
> 
>

Attachment: AoC DT Action Plan with Drake & Gomes Edits.doc
Description: AoC DT Action Plan with Drake & Gomes Edits.doc

Attachment: AoC RTs Process for GNSO Endorsements with Drake and Gomes edits.doc
Description: AoC RTs Process for GNSO Endorsements with Drake and Gomes edits.doc