AW: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: Upcoming Affirmation reviews - draft call for candidatures

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm fine with your rewording suggestions, Chuck
 


Regards 
Wolf-Ulrich 

 


________________________________

        Von: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
        Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010 16:14
        An: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Betreff: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: Upcoming Affirmation reviews -
draft call for candidatures
        Wichtigkeit: Hoch
        
        
        Janis just sent me a reminder that he is looking for additional
feedback on the next draft call for candidatures for the next two review
teams.  In that regard, please provide feeback this week if possible
regarding the following two questions?
         
        1. Are you okay with the feedback I already provided (see
below)?
         
        2. Do you have any other feedback regarding the draft call?
         
        Chuck

________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:19 PM
        To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: Upcoming Affirmation reviews - draft
call for candidatures
        
        
        Here are the personal comments I sent to Marco and the SOAC list
regarding the draft call for candidatures.
         
        Chuck

________________________________

        From: Gomes, Chuck 
        Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:17 PM
        To: 'Marco Lorenzoni'; langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx; ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx;
secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; janis.karklins@xxxxxxxxx; steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
jun@xxxxxxxxxx
        Cc: Ray Plzak; Rod Beckstrom; bmanning@xxxxxxxxxxx; Larson,
Matt; woolf@xxxxxxx; Donna Austin; Alice Jansen
        Subject: RE: Upcoming Affirmation reviews - draft call for
candidatures
        
        
        Thanks Marco.  Let me start off the discussion.
         
        Let me first say that these are my personal comments.  I have
not vetted them within the GNSO yet but will do so.
         
        The second sentence it the Timeline sections says, "The
approximate time requirement for each team member is expected to last
between 15 and 20 days."  I think it would help to word this
differently.  As it stands, it could be interpreted several ways, one of
which is that the job will be over in 15-20 days, which I do not believe
is what is intended but a newcomer could think that.  Here is one
possible rewording: "The approximate total time commitment for each team
member is expected to be 15 to 20 days spread out over the course of the
total review period."
         
        Also in the Timeline section, item 3 says, " Promoting
competition, consumer trust and consumer choice - one year after the
entry in operation of the new gTLDs "  What does "entry in operation of
the new gTLDs" mean?  Does this timeframe mean one year after the first
new gTLD is entered into the root or one year after all applied for new
gTLDs are entered into the root?  Those two extremes will probably
differ in a range of years, so this needs to be more precisely defined.
         
        The last sentence of the document says the following: "No double
membership, meaning that the same individuals cannot be appointed to
serve on more than one review team. This is strongly suggested in
considering the relevant amount of time that will be required by the
review exercises."  The first sentence sounds definitive; then the use
of "strongly suggested" in the second sentence makes it sound optional.
Which is it?  If it is definitely not allowed, the the last sentence
could be changed to something like the following:  "This restriction is
being imposed because of the large amount of time required for each of
the review exercises."  If the intent is to allow a little flexibility
here, then it might work to change this paragraph to something like the
following: "It is strongly suggested that there be no double membership,
meaning that the same individual cannot be appointed to serve on more
than one review team.  Any exceptions to this must be approved by
(Selectors?)."
         
        As other input from the GNSO is received, I will forward it on.
         
        Chuck


________________________________

                From: Marco Lorenzoni [mailto:marco.lorenzoni@xxxxxxxxx]

                Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:38 AM
                To: Gomes, Chuck; langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx; ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx;
secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; janis.karklins@xxxxxxxxx; steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
jun@xxxxxxxxxx
                Cc: Ray Plzak; Rod Beckstrom; bmanning@xxxxxxxxxxx;
Larson, Matt; woolf@xxxxxxx; Donna Austin; Alice Jansen
                Subject: Upcoming Affirmation reviews - draft call for
candidatures
                Importance: High
                
                

                Dear SO/AC Chairs,

                Following up on the recent discussion on the recruitment
process for members of the 'Security Stability and resilience' and
'Whois' Review Teams, please find in attachment a draft text of the
suggested call for volunteers.

                The text has been prepared based on the experiences made
during the previous process of selection, trying to respect the key
points emerging from your recent discussion.

                The idea is to have a central repository for all
applications, and to forward applications to the relevant SO/ACs for
endorsement. Only those applicants that will be endorsed by SO/ACs will
be considered by Selectors for membership. 

                Please share your comments / proposals for modifications
as to get to an agreed text by mid-May.

                Thanks and best regards

                 

                Marco Lorenzoni

                ---------------------

                ICANN

                Director, Organizational Review

                marco.lorenzoni@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:marco.lorenzoni@xxxxxxxxx> 

                Phone: +32.2.234 78 69

                Mobile: +32.475.72 47 47

                Fax: +32 2 234 7848

                Skype: marco_lorenzoni

                ---------------------

                6, Rond Point Schuman
                B-1040 Brussels, Belgium