ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
  • From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:11:02 +0200


On May 27, 2010, at 9:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Note the following message I just sent to the SOAC list regarding opening the 
> call for AoC RT applicants.  As soon as we have our draft process, I would 
> like to send it to Marco & Janis if no one objects. Can we finalize the 
> proposed process not later than tomorrow so that Bill may send it to the 
> Council list by then?  If so, then I will send it as a draft to Marco & Janis.

Mixing together the details of the next two RTs and the permanent process seems 
to complicate discussion, how about we focus here on the latter.  To finalize 
we need clarification from selectors et al on the expected regular RT time 
cycles so contracted folk can decide how long they can have after the calls 
close, bearing in mind the potentially three week wait after that to the next 
council call.  When you reach closure we'll plug in the number.

Also was this suggestion on the qualifications ok with people

> 7. A two to three paragraph statement about the applicant's knowledge
> of the GNSO community and its structure and operations, and any details
> of his/her participation therein or, in the event that an applicant has not 
> been involved in the GNSO community, 
> a two to three paragraph statement attesting to knowledge of the substantive 
> issues for which the GNSO is responsible.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy