RE: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection

["Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am fine with that qualifications paragraph Bill.

Thanks,

Caroline.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: 28 May 2010 10:11
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: [soac-discussion] FW: Next selection
Importance: High


Hi

On May 27, 2010, at 9:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> 
> Note the following message I just sent to the SOAC list regarding
opening the call for AoC RT applicants.  As soon as we have our draft
process, I would like to send it to Marco & Janis if no one objects. Can
we finalize the proposed process not later than tomorrow so that Bill
may send it to the Council list by then?  If so, then I will send it as
a draft to Marco & Janis.

Mixing together the details of the next two RTs and the permanent
process seems to complicate discussion, how about we focus here on the
latter.  To finalize we need clarification from selectors et al on the
expected regular RT time cycles so contracted folk can decide how long
they can have after the calls close, bearing in mind the potentially
three week wait after that to the next council call.  When you reach
closure we'll plug in the number.

Also was this suggestion on the qualifications ok with people

> 7. A two to three paragraph statement about the applicant's knowledge
> of the GNSO community and its structure and operations, and any
details
> of his/her participation therein or, in the event that an applicant
has not been involved in the GNSO community, 
> a two to three paragraph statement attesting to knowledge of the
substantive issues for which the GNSO is responsible.