Re: [gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg] Start of ccTLD IDN Questions - Council Rework Group

["Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,
thanks for your email.
For me monday, wednesday or thursday work fine, time of the three options
are ok.
Only one comment, 0800 calls do not work from Argentina, so when we decide
date and time I can send my telephone to be contacted.
Regards
Olga


2007/11/29, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>  Thanks to each of you for volunteering to be a part of the GNSO Council
> Group tasked with reviewing the draft GNSO comments to the ccNSO/GAC Issues
> Paper on IDN ccTLDs.  For your information, here is the current list of
> group members:
>
>
> Belal Beirm, BC
>
> Edmon Chung, RyC
>
> Olga Cavalli, Nom Com Rep
>
> Avri Doria, NomCom Rep
>
> Chuck Gomes, Chair
>
> Adrian Kinderis, RC
>
> Stefanie Lai, NCUC
>
>
>
> To get us started I would like to propose the following:
>
>
>
> Proposed Approach for Reworking GNSO Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper on
> IDN ccTLDs:
>
>
>
>    1. Individual review of existing draft GNSO document by all group
>    members
>    2. Initial teleconference call for the following  purposes:
>       1. Identifying areas in the existing draft GNSO document that
>       need further work
>       2. Identifying issues that we should possibly address that are
>       not contained in the Issues Paper or in our document
>       3. Developing a work plan for the group including:
>
>                                                                i.      An
> estimated time frame
>
>                                                              ii.      Possible
> ways of organizing our work (e.g., assigning different issues for group
> members to take the lead on or handling them as a group)
>
>    1. Email list discussion of areas identified in items 2.a and 2.b.
>    2. Additional teleconference calls as needed.
>
> Please provide any feedback you have on this approach.  We may modify it
> however we decide as a group.
>
> To get us started, I would like to schedule an initial teleconference for
> next week.  Please communicate on this list which of the following options
> would work for you.
>
> 1. Monday, 3 December at 13:00 UTC
>
>     [5 am PST (California), 8 am EST (New York), 10 am ART (Buenos
> Aires), 2 pm CET (Brussels), 3 pm EET (Amman), 9 pm HKT (Hong Kong)]
>
> 2. Tuesday, 4 December at 14:00 UTC
>
>     [6 am PST (California), 9 am EST (New York), 11 am ART (Buenos
> Aires), 3 pm CET (Brussels), 4 pm EET (Amman), 10 pm HKT (Hong Kong)]
>
> 3. Thursday, 6 December at 13:00 UTC
>
>     [5 am PST (California), 8 am EST (New York), 10 am ART (Buenos
> Aires), 2 pm CET (Brussels), 3 pm EET (Amman), 9 pm HKT (Hong Kong)]
>
> 4. Friday, 7 December at 14:00 UTC
>
>     [6 am PST (California), 9 am EST (New York), 11 am ART (Buenos
> Aires), 3 pm CET (Brussels), 4 pm EET (Amman), 10 pm HKT (Hong Kong)]
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
> it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and
> destroy/delete the original transmission."
>
>