RE: [gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg] RE: GNSO Response to the ccNSO GAC issues Report on IDNs

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you very much Tina.  I will shortly be sending a final red-line
version to the list so that everyone in the group can readily see the
final edits made.  As you will see: 1) I support the majority of your
edits; 2) I deleted the use of the term 'homologue', a term that I think
Cary introduced; 3) I had already added some words that I think dealt
with your concern at the top of page 16 regarding whether apportionment
answered the question.
 
Chuck

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tina Dam
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 6:47 PM
To: Liz Gasster; gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg] RE: GNSO Response to the ccNSO GAC issues
Report on IDNs



I did not make these early enough last night to make them into the
original doc send my Liz - apologies, but it was a rather booked day.
Also, you will see that I did not find many incorrect terminology uses,
but made a few other suggestions which I believe are not changing the
intend with the paper, but rather clarifying. Please feel free to use as
you see fit.

 

Tina

 

From: owner-gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 3:42 PM
To: gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-cc-idn-tld-rg] FW: GNSO Response to the ccNSO GAC issues
Report on IDNs

 

All, please see comments and edits from Tina Dam on the attached.
Thanks, Liz