ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ccwg-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-ccwg-dt] FW: [council] Cross community working groups

  • To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-ccwg-dt] FW: [council] Cross community working groups
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:37:31 +0100

Thanks Glen,

Just to help get the group discussion going, allow me to resubmit what Jaime 
sent to the Council list yesterday on CWGs.

Initiating discussions as a first kick ahead of the list, I advance and
restate my opinion.

Cross Community Working Groups can work well to foster informal
communication and understanding on specific issues among stakeholders.
But formal communication with the Board must be framed so as not to
undermine SOs and ACs authority.

Stéphane



Le 3 mars 2011 à 11:32, Glen de Saint Géry a écrit :

> 
> Dear All,
> 
> A mailing list has been created <Gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx> with public archives 
> at
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-ccwg-dt/
> 
> The following participants who volunteered have been added to the mailing 
> list:
> Rosemary Sinclair
> Wendy Seltzer
> Bill Drake
> Jaime Wagner
> Jeff Neuman
> Tim Ruiz
> Jonathan Robinson
> 
> Stéphane van Gelder, GNSO chair and Mary Wong have been added as observers as 
> is the custom to add the chair and vice chairs to all mailing lists.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> Thank you.
> Kind regards
> 
> Glen
> 
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> Councillors,
> 
> As a reminder, during our previous meeting the subject of CWGs was discussed 
> and that we had planned to put together a discussion group on this.
> 
> So far, volunteers to the group are: Rosemary, Jaime, Bill, Tim, Jonathan, 
> Jeff and Wendy.
> 
> Has the group chosen a leader and if so, could you let the Council know who 
> that is?
> 
> Is it feasible to ask the discussion group to come back with a summary of 
> discussions and possible positions that the Council could adopt on CWGs 
> within 2 months?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy