[gnso-ccwg-dt] Cross community working groups

["Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf" <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Unless I missed something, the last msg on our list was this one on march
31.

I understood we are expected to present a first report at the Singapore
Meeting, but didn’t see sufficient discussions on the list.

 

Some views and questions by way of “keeping alive”:

 

1)      CCWG reports directly to the Board should not be allowed in any
circumstances. Reports should be to the chartering organizations.

2)      Board questioning could be addressed directly to the CCWG
afterwards? Or questioning should also be done exclusively through the
chartering orgs?

3)      Are there scope limitations to the proposition of new CCWGs?

4)      Are GNSO Working Group rules applicable to guide CCWG working
methods also? 

5)      What is the process for these rules to be ratified as such?

 

 

Jaime Wagner

 <mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Direto (51) 3219-5955  Cel (51) 8126-0916

Geral  (51) 3233-3551 

 <http://www.powerself.com.br/> www.powerself.com.br

 

De: owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Em
nome de William Drake
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 31 de março de 2011 14:18
Para: gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [gnso-ccwg-dt] FW: [council] Cross community
working groups

 

Hi 

 

I'm in full agreement with Mr. Wagner-PowerSelf on the below points.

 

Cheers

 

Bill

 

 

On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:06 PM, Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf wrote:





My preference as to the liaison question: 1) Four liaisons as above; 2) Two
liaisons, one of each house; 2) One single liaison. But the existence of a
liaison or many does not preclude the CCWG which I think is a more effective
mechanism to foster understanding (I’m not saying agreement).

 

So, my position is to favor informal, individual GAC member participation in
CCWGs, with the consideration that they are not representing formal
positions of their countries but bringing an informed and legitimate point
of view. Moreover, the same applies to GNSO participants in these CCWGs.