[gnso-ccwg-dt] Fwd: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

[Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all

Motion has a seconder

I have gone with WG and avoided ref to "joint"...

Cheers

Rosemary


Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490

Begin forwarded message:

From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 21 September 2011 7:51:55 AM AEST
To: Rosemary Sinclair 
<rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
"jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
"knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>" 
<knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Microsoft Office User 
<gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

Thank you, the seconding has been noted on the Wiki.
Kind regards,

Glen


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org


-----Original Message-----
From: Rosemary Sinclair [mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: mardi 20 septembre 2011 23:35
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Glen 
de Saint Géry; <mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx> 
knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

Hi all

I am happy if we go with just Working Group....it is very inclusive and I don't 
think those involved will worry...they are keen to see the Motion passed

Thanks Wolf for your second!

Cheers

Rosemary


________________________________________
From: Jonathan Robinson 
[jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:20 PM
To: 'Glen de Saint Géry'; knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
Rosemary Sinclair
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

What about simply dropping the j?
The charter is very inclusive as it stands.

Best,

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 September 2011 12:56
To: knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

Rosemary,
Do you accept the friendly amendment? Please let me know so that it can be
registered on the Wiki Page.
Thank you very much.
Glen

----- Message d'origine -----
De : KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : Thursday, September 15, 2011 03:02 AM
À : jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>>;
rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
<rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>>; Glen de 
Saint
Géry; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Objet : AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page


Hi,

Maybe it helps to use a lower case "joint" (jWG) until the frame for (J)WGs
is fixed - or is this even more subtle?
If not I'd like to propose it as a friendly amendment and second the motion.


Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Jonathan Robinson
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2011 16:24
An: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'; 'GNSO Council List'
Betreff: RE: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page


Hi Rosemary,

The draft charter refers to a (GNSO) WG yet the motion refers to a JWG.

Am I missing an obvious subtlety here?

Thanks,


Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
Sent: 13 September 2011 21:38
To: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page


Hi all

I'd welcome any comments on the Motion I have proposed...

And a seconder for the Motion!

Cheers

Rosemary
________________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf
Of Glen de Saint Géry [Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:17 AM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Motions on the Wiki page

Dear Councillors,

Please find the motions proposed by:
-  Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and seconded by Stéphane van Gelder on the revision of
the GNSO Council Operating Procedures  Relating to Proxy  Voting
-  Rosemary Sinclair to create a joint working group on consumer choice,
competition and innovation
-  Zahid Jamil to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse Policies Working
Group Recommendations

On the Wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September
+2011

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org





__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6461 (20110913) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com






__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6464 (20110914) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com