RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Fwd: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

["Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Rosemary,

 

Many thanks.  Look forward to confirmation from staff that the motion has been 
updated accordingly.

 

Best wishes,

 

Jonathan

 

7. MOTION TO CREATE JOINT WORKING GROUP ON CONSUMER CHOICE, COMPETITION, AND 
INNOVATION (CCI):

Made by: Rosemary Sinclair
Seconded by: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben

Whereas,  on 10 December 2010, the ICANN Board adopted Resolution 30 ( 
<http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm> 
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#) requesting advice 
from the GNSO, CCNSO, ALAC and GAC on establishing the definition, measures, 
and three year targets for those measures, for competition, consumer trust and 
consumer choice in the context of the domain name system, such advice to be 
provided for discussion at the ICANN International Public meeting in San 
Francisco from 13-18 March 2011;

Whereas, since the receipt of this request, the GNSO Council has conducted 
preliminary work (led by Rosemary Sinclair) to develop these metrics through 
various workshops conducted at the Cartagena ICANN Meeting, and the Singapore 
ICANN Meeting;

Whereas, as a result of these preliminary activities, there is a desire to form 
a joint working group with any of these SO/ACs interested in participating in 
this joint effort to fulfill this Board request, in accordance with the Draft 
Charter  <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf> 
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf presented to the GNSO 
Council.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

Resolved, that the GNSO Council directs that a joint working group be formed to 
produce a report for consideration by SOs /ACs to assist them to respond to the 
Board request for establishing the definition, measures, and three year targets 
for those measures, for competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the 
context of the domain name system;

Resolved further, that this newly formed joint working group is not authorized 
to forward to, or otherwise communicate its findings directly with, the ICANN 
Board;

Resolved further, that Rosemary Sinclair shall serve as the GNSO Council 
Liaison for this joint working group;

Resolved further, it is recognized that the Consumer Choice, Competition, and 
Innovation (CCI) WG has already met informally and commenced activities in 
furtherance of this effort.  Until such time as the WG can select a chair and 
that chair can be confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council Liaison shall 
act as interim chair; and

Resolved further, that the Charter  
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf> 
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf is hereby approved for 
the CCI WG.   As specified in the Charter  
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf> 
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf, a Working Group Update 
Report is to be produced for consideration at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in 
October, 2011.  

Resolved further, that in the event that no other SO/AC approves of the terms 
of this Charter  <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf> 
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf, the CCI WG shall 
continue to proceed as a GNSO Council chartered joint Working Group.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
Sent: 20 September 2011 23:44
To: gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Fwd: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

 

Hi all

 

Motion has a seconder

 

I have gone with WG and avoided ref to "joint"...

Cheers

 

Rosemary

 

 

Rosemary Sinclair

Director, External Relations

Australian School of Business

UNSW

+61 413 734490


Begin forwarded message:

From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 21 September 2011 7:51:55 AM AEST
To: Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
"jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
"knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx" <knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Microsoft Office User <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

Thank you, the seconding has been noted on the Wiki.
Kind regards,

Glen


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org


-----Original Message-----
From: Rosemary Sinclair [mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: mardi 20 septembre 2011 23:35
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

Hi all

I am happy if we go with just Working Group....it is very inclusive and I don't 
think those involved will worry...they are keen to see the Motion passed

Thanks Wolf for your second!

Cheers

Rosemary


________________________________________
From: Jonathan Robinson [jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:20 PM
To: 'Glen de Saint Géry'; knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx; Rosemary Sinclair
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

What about simply dropping the j?
The charter is very inclusive as it stands.

Best,

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 September 2011 12:56
To: knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx; jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx;
rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page

Rosemary,
Do you accept the friendly amendment? Please let me know so that it can be
registered on the Wiki Page.
Thank you very much.
Glen

----- Message d'origine -----
De : KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : Thursday, September 15, 2011 03:02 AM
À : jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Glen de Saint
Géry; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page


Hi,

Maybe it helps to use a lower case "joint" (jWG) until the frame for (J)WGs
is fixed - or is this even more subtle?
If not I'd like to propose it as a friendly amendment and second the motion.


Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Jonathan Robinson
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2011 16:24
An: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'; 'GNSO Council List'
Betreff: RE: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page


Hi Rosemary,

The draft charter refers to a (GNSO) WG yet the motion refers to a JWG.

Am I missing an obvious subtlety here?

Thanks,


Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
Sent: 13 September 2011 21:38
To: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page


Hi all

I'd welcome any comments on the Motion I have proposed...

And a seconder for the Motion!

Cheers

Rosemary
________________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Glen de Saint Géry [Glen@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:17 AM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Motions on the Wiki page

Dear Councillors,

Please find the motions proposed by:
-  Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and seconded by Stéphane van Gelder on the revision of
the GNSO Council Operating Procedures  Relating to Proxy  Voting
-  Rosemary Sinclair to create a joint working group on consumer choice,
competition and innovation
-  Zahid Jamil to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse Policies Working
Group Recommendations

On the Wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September
+2011

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org





__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6461 (20110913) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com






__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6464 (20110914) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com