<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Fwd: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
- To: "jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rosemary Sinclair'" <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Fwd: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:38:15 -0700
Dear All,
The motion has been updated accordingly.
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org
From: owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: mercredi 21 septembre 2011 11:38
To: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Fwd: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
Hi Rosemary,
Many thanks. Look forward to confirmation from staff that the motion has been
updated accordingly.
Best wishes,
Jonathan
7. MOTION TO CREATE JOINT WORKING GROUP ON CONSUMER CHOICE, COMPETITION, AND
INNOVATION (CCI):
Made by: Rosemary Sinclair
Seconded by: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Whereas, on 10 December 2010, the ICANN Board adopted Resolution 30
(http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#<http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm>)
requesting advice from the GNSO, CCNSO, ALAC and GAC on establishing the
definition, measures, and three year targets for those measures, for
competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the context of the domain
name system, such advice to be provided for discussion at the ICANN
International Public meeting in San Francisco from 13-18 March 2011;
Whereas, since the receipt of this request, the GNSO Council has conducted
preliminary work (led by Rosemary Sinclair) to develop these metrics through
various workshops conducted at the Cartagena ICANN Meeting, and the Singapore
ICANN Meeting;
Whereas, as a result of these preliminary activities, there is a desire to form
a joint working group with any of these SO/ACs interested in participating in
this joint effort to fulfill this Board request, in accordance with the Draft
Charter http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf presented to
the GNSO Council.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
Resolved, that the GNSO Council directs that a joint working group be formed to
produce a report for consideration by SOs /ACs to assist them to respond to the
Board request for establishing the definition, measures, and three year targets
for those measures, for competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the
context of the domain name system;
Resolved further, that this newly formed joint working group is not authorized
to forward to, or otherwise communicate its findings directly with, the ICANN
Board;
Resolved further, that Rosemary Sinclair shall serve as the GNSO Council
Liaison for this joint working group;
Resolved further, it is recognized that the Consumer Choice, Competition, and
Innovation (CCI) WG has already met informally and commenced activities in
furtherance of this effort. Until such time as the WG can select a chair and
that chair can be confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council Liaison shall
act as interim chair; and
Resolved further, that the Charter
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf is hereby approved for
the CCI WG. As specified in the Charter
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf, a Working Group Update
Report is to be produced for consideration at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in
October, 2011.
Resolved further, that in the event that no other SO/AC approves of the terms
of this Charter http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf, the
CCI WG shall continue to proceed as a GNSO Council chartered joint Working
Group.
From: owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
Sent: 20 September 2011 23:44
To: gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Fwd: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
Hi all
Motion has a seconder
I have gone with WG and avoided ref to "joint"...
Cheers
Rosemary
Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490
Begin forwarded message:
From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 21 September 2011 7:51:55 AM AEST
To: Rosemary Sinclair
<rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>>,
"jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>"
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>>,
"knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>"
<knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Microsoft Office User
<gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
Thank you, the seconding has been noted on the Wiki.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Rosemary Sinclair [mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: mardi 20 septembre 2011 23:35
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Glen
de Saint Géry; knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
Hi all
I am happy if we go with just Working Group....it is very inclusive and I don't
think those involved will worry...they are keen to see the Motion passed
Thanks Wolf for your second!
Cheers
Rosemary
________________________________________
From: Jonathan Robinson
[jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:20 PM
To: 'Glen de Saint Géry'; knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>;
Rosemary Sinclair
Subject: RE: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
What about simply dropping the j?
The charter is very inclusive as it stands.
Best,
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 September 2011 12:56
To: knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:knobenw@xxxxxxxxxx>;
jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
Rosemary,
Do you accept the friendly amendment? Please let me know so that it can be
registered on the Wiki Page.
Thank you very much.
Glen
----- Message d'origine -----
De : KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : Thursday, September 15, 2011 03:02 AM
À : jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>>;
rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>>; Glen de
Saint
Géry; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Objet : AW: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
Hi,
Maybe it helps to use a lower case "joint" (jWG) until the frame for (J)WGs
is fixed - or is this even more subtle?
If not I'd like to propose it as a friendly amendment and second the motion.
Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Jonathan Robinson
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2011 16:24
An: 'Rosemary Sinclair'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'; 'GNSO Council List'
Betreff: RE: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
Hi Rosemary,
The draft charter refers to a (GNSO) WG yet the motion refers to a JWG.
Am I missing an obvious subtlety here?
Thanks,
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
Sent: 13 September 2011 21:38
To: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] RE: Motions on the Wiki page
Hi all
I'd welcome any comments on the Motion I have proposed...
And a seconder for the Motion!
Cheers
Rosemary
________________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf
Of Glen de Saint Géry [Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:17 AM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Motions on the Wiki page
Dear Councillors,
Please find the motions proposed by:
- Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and seconded by Stéphane van Gelder on the revision of
the GNSO Council Operating Procedures Relating to Proxy Voting
- Rosemary Sinclair to create a joint working group on consumer choice,
competition and innovation
- Zahid Jamil to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse Policies Working
Group Recommendations
On the Wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September
+2011
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6461 (20110913) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6464 (20110914) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|