Re: [gnso-ccwg-dt] Some more suggested edits to the principles document

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Wendy.  I've tried to capture your addition in a bullet in the
revised version that I will be sending shortly.

Best,
Julie


On 11/22/11 4:08 PM, "Wendy Seltzer" <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> As mentioned in the call, I think it would be helpful to include some
> explicit limitations on CWGs' work, namely:
> CWGs' output must not be taken as an expression of community consensus,
> except as it may be endorsed as such by its chartering organization(s).
> 
> Now a CWG's charter could override that provision, with explicit
> reference, giving people notice that unless they participated in the
> CWG, they'd risk losing opportunity to object. But in the ordinary
> course, I think limitations on the use of CWGs' output makes the groups
> themselves more flexible and easier to establish.
> 
> --Wendy
> 
> On 11/22/2011 10:31 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> 
>> For those who do not know, I have decided to join this group along with
>> Jonathan from the RySG with the understanding that Jonathan will still be the
>> primary RySG representative.
>> 
>> I attached a red-lined version of the principles showing some suggested edits
>> with comments explaining my thinking.  If I had a Word version of the
>> document instead of a PDF, I would have integrated my edits with those
>> submitted by others.
>> 
>> I will do my best to participate in the call today but likely will not have
>> online access because I will be driving my wife to have a medical procedure.
>> 
>> 
>> Chuck Gomes, Vice President, Policy & Compliance
>> Verisign Naming
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 3108 Ponte Morino Drive, Suite 210, Cameron Park , CA 95682
>> Office: +1 530 676-1100; Mobile: +1 703 362-8753
>> 
>> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it
>> is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential
>> and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use,
>> distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the
>> original transmission."
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>