<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft Principles -- "wherever possible"?
- To: mike@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ccwg-dt] FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft Principles -- "wherever possible"?
- From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:40:13 -0700
I want to second Mikey's view on the draft and, that he, like me, is an
old geezer.
Berard
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ccwg-dt] FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft Principles --
> "wherever possible"?
> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, December 14, 2011 5:32 am
> To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ccwg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> thanks Julie,
>
> i really want to continue the discussion about 2.a,ii where we leave the
> [wherever possible] clause in. here's the sentence, just to make the thread
> easier to follow;
>
> All participating SOs/ACs should approve a single, joint Charter [whenever
> possible] that defines the rules and procedures for the CWG.
>
>
> as your customer, i want to understand the circumstances where a working
> group would be handed *more than one* charter to operate under. that seems
> really weird to me. i'd also really like to understand how we think the
> working group is going to operate if it has more than one charter.
>
> - alternating charters by week?
>
> - half the working group works under one, the other half under the
> other?
>
> - hand the unresolved dispute to the co-chairs and let *them* resolve
> it?
>
> as an old geezer, it's always fun to see new things but i have to admit that
> i've never heard of a plane going to two destinations at the same time -- or
> leaving the destination-dispute up to the pilots to decide after the plane
> has taken off. i think the airline's customers would get restive�
>
> mikey
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Julie Hedlund wrote:
>
> FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft Principles
>
>
> All,
>
> Attached in Word and PDF are the revised Draft Principles based on the
> changes agreed to on today�s call. Note that the redline reflects new
> additions on the call. Redlining was removed where edits from the list and
> the meeting on 22 November have been accepted. This also is posted to the
> wiki at:
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoccwgdraftteam/5.+Background+Documents.
>
>
> Note: As discussed the rationale section is included, but it was agreed that
> it would not be included in the version sent to the Council. However,
> further edits to the rationale text are encouraged as these may be useful to
> provide during Council discussions.
>
> Our next call is scheduled for Tuesday, 20 December at UTC/1200 PST/1500
> EST/2000 London/2100 CET. A reminder will be send prior to the call.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Attendees: Jonathan Robinson (Chair), Chuck Gomes, Alan Greenberg, Mikey
> O�Conner, Wendy Seltzer, Jaime Wagner; Staff: Julie Hedlund, Liz Gasster, and
> Nathalie Peregrine
>
>
>
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|