<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working group for GNSO Council restructuring
- To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working group for GNSO Council restructuring
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:25:58 -0400
It looks like 11-13 July should work for me.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Nevett, Jonathon
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:12 PM
> To: tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working group
> for GNSO Council restructuring
>
>
> Tony:
>
> According to my wife, I prefer the 11th and 12th as well.
> Apparently, I have a conflict on Sunday the 13th.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jon
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 4:07 AM
> > To: Glen@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working
> group for GNSO
> > Council restructuring
> >
> >
> > All
> >
> > Regarding the face to face meeting I'd like to support the proposal
> > for the weekend 12 -13 July, although I could also make the 11th if
> > that helps. We all have busy schedules and I'm sure meeting
> during the
> > normal working week would always prove problematical for
> somebody, so
> > this seems a good way forward and the timing fits well with
> the time
> > we have available to complete this task.
> >
> > I'd also like to suggest that we send a joint letter to the GAC
> > expressing a wish that they engage in such an important process. It
> > would also be helpful to us to have a neutral and fresh opinion, as
> > well as helping to build a better relationship for the
> future. Guess
> > it may also be beneficial if we could encourage some GAC reps to
> > engage with us at the same time as we send the note.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Glen de Saint
> > Géry
> > Sent: 29 June 2008 18:16
> > To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working group for GNSO
> > Council restructuring
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > A new mailing list <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx> (there
> are no public
> > archives) has been created for the group instructed by the
> ICANN Board
> > to resolve the issue of restructuring the GNSO Council.
> > * One representative from the current NomCom appointees -
> > Avri Doria,
> > * One member from each constituency:
> > Philip Sheppard - CBUC
> > Steve Metalitz - IPC
> > Tony Holmes - ISPCPC
> > NCUC still awaiting name
> > Jon Nevett - Registrars
> > Chuck Gomes - Registries
> > * One member from each liaison-appointing advisory
> > committee (if that advisory committee so desires)
> > Alan Greenberg - ALAC (still to be confirmed)
> > The GAC Chair has advised the ICANN Board that it is unlikely
> > that the GAC will provide a representative to the working
> group, but
> > has nevertheless sent a message to the GAC list to see if
> there is any
> > interest.
> >
> > The Board said the group should reach consensus and submit
> a consensus
> > recommendation on GNSO Council restructuring back to the
> Board by no
> > later than Friday, 25 July 2008. The Board then expects to consider
> > the working group recommendation as soon as possible, but no later
> > than it's meeting in August.
> > That meeting is currently scheduled for 28 August 2008.
> >
> > Please let me know at your earliest convenience dates that would be
> > work for you for a face to face meeting. Dates that have been
> > suggested so far are 12-13 July (a week-end).
> >
> > With the USA 4 July holiday weekend, please give an
> indication of the
> > first possible date for a teleconference.
> > Wednesday 2 July has been suggested, but does not work for
> Tony Holmes
> > and Chuck Gomes.
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Glen
> > Glen de Saint Géry
> > GNSO Secretariat
> > gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://gnso.icann.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|