ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consensus-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working group for GNSO Council restructuring

  • To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working group for GNSO Council restructuring
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:25:58 -0400

It looks like 11-13 July should work for me.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Nevett, Jonathon
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:12 PM
> To: tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working group 
> for GNSO Council restructuring 
> 
> 
> Tony:
> 
> According to my wife, I prefer the 11th and 12th as well.  
> Apparently, I have a conflict on Sunday the 13th.  
> 
> Thanks!  
> 
> Jon
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> > tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 4:07 AM
> > To: Glen@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working 
> group for GNSO 
> > Council restructuring
> > 
> > 
> > All
> > 
> > Regarding the face to face meeting I'd like to support the proposal 
> > for the weekend 12 -13 July, although I could also make the 11th if 
> > that helps. We all have busy schedules and I'm sure meeting 
> during the 
> > normal working week would always prove problematical for 
> somebody, so 
> > this seems a good way forward and the timing fits well with 
> the time 
> > we have available to complete this task.
> > 
> > I'd also like to suggest that we send a joint letter to the GAC 
> > expressing a wish that they engage in such an important process. It 
> > would also be helpful to us to have a neutral and fresh opinion, as 
> > well as helping to build a better relationship for the 
> future. Guess 
> > it may also be beneficial if we could encourage some GAC reps to 
> > engage with us at the same time as we send the note.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Tony
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Glen de Saint 
> > Géry
> > Sent: 29 June 2008 18:16
> > To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] GNSO consensus working group for GNSO 
> > Council restructuring
> > 
> > 
> > Dear All,
> > 
> > A new mailing list  <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx> (there 
> are no public 
> > archives) has been created for the group instructed by the 
> ICANN Board 
> > to resolve the issue of  restructuring the GNSO Council.
> > *     One representative from the current NomCom appointees - 
> > Avri Doria,
> > *     One member from each constituency:
> >    Philip Sheppard - CBUC
> >    Steve Metalitz - IPC
> >    Tony Holmes - ISPCPC
> >    NCUC still awaiting name
> >    Jon Nevett - Registrars
> >    Chuck Gomes - Registries
> > *     One member from each liaison-appointing advisory 
> > committee (if that advisory committee so desires)
> >       Alan Greenberg - ALAC (still to be confirmed)
> >      The GAC Chair has advised the ICANN Board that it is unlikely 
> > that the GAC will provide a representative to the working 
> group, but 
> > has nevertheless sent a message to the GAC list to see if 
> there is any 
> > interest.
> > 
> > The Board said the group should reach consensus and submit 
> a consensus 
> > recommendation on GNSO Council restructuring back to the 
> Board by no 
> > later than Friday, 25 July 2008. The Board then expects to consider 
> > the working group recommendation as soon as possible, but no later 
> > than it's meeting in August.
> > That meeting is currently scheduled for 28 August 2008.
> > 
> > Please let me know at your earliest convenience dates that would be 
> > work for you for a face to face meeting. Dates that have been 
> > suggested so far are 12-13 July (a week-end).
> > 
> > With the USA 4 July holiday weekend, please give an 
> indication of the 
> > first possible date for a teleconference.
> > Wednesday 2 July has been suggested, but does not work for 
> Tony Holmes 
> > and Chuck Gomes.
> > 
> > Thank you very much.
> > Kind regards,
> > 
> > Glen
> > Glen de Saint Géry
> > GNSO Secretariat
> > gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://gnso.icann.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy