<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion at today's meeting
- To: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion at today's meeting
- From: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 03:12:31 -0400
You are welcome, Steve. It might be better to view yours and mine as
separate proposals going forward. I.e., I get the sense that there are
people in the WG who prefer my original over your modifications and I
wouldn't want your second proposal to be considered an amendment that
eliminates my first one.
________________________________
From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 4:56 PM
To: Milton L Mueller; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion at today's
meeting
See attached suggested modification of Milton's document. Thanks to
Milton for putting a concrete proposal on the table.
Steve Metalitz
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 4:01 AM
To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion at today's meeting
See attached document. It is entitled "The Compromise Parity Proposal"
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|