Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

My first temptation after seeing your chart, was to remove all the  
ones i found unacceptable (e.g. those where nomcom appointee < 3), but  
then I realized that if we all did that we would get back to the null  
table.
a.

On 10 Jul 2008, at 08:16, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> Here’s Philip’s chart with all the “not gonna be acceptable under  
> any circumstances” options removed.
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> ] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 5:13 AM
> To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options
>
> The attached excel chart may help us all assess various voting /  
> seats scenarios.
> It has 16 options but is not exhaustive.
>
> I submit it in the interests of debate and am not taking a position  
> on any option here listed or not.
> Philip
>
> <Actualk GNSO reform options 2008.xls>