RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion July 17

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Without commenting on the original reference, "consumer protection" 
may be out of scope, but crafting within-scope policy which factors 
in consumer needs and impact must certainly be relevant.
Alan

At 15/07/2008 03:57 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Philip,
>
> I am curious as to why you included 'consumer protection' experts in 
> the list of possible areas of expertise for NomCom reps.  It is my 
> understanding that consumer protection is outside ICANN's mission.
> Chuck
>
>
> ----------
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 11:12 AM
> To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion July 17
>
> Please find attached a proposal for discussion at our next call July  17.
>
> This is a compromise proposal attempting to lie within the bounding 
> statements made on previous calls by the constituencies.
> It is sent now to allow time for constituency discussion before our call.
>
> Philip