Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion July 17

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

But would people agree that this might be an acceptable constituency  
within an expanded NCSG
(assuming there was such a constituency that wished to organize and  
get involved and that the NCSG was created so as to allow new  
constituencies to form etc... and recognizing that talking about how  
any SG is organized is defined as beyond our remit.)
a.

On 16 Jul 2008, at 13:30, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Agreed Alan, as long as it involves issues within ICANN's mission.   
> But it is not a good idea in my opinion to view ICANN (and hence the  
> GNSO) as a consumer protection organization because it is not part  
> of their mission, they do not have the resources to do that and  
> there are organizations already in place to handle that.
> Chuck