ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consensus-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concept

  • To: <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concept
  • From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:21:55 +0200

On PDP thresholds,
the 2/3 in both houses requirement for consensus policy is in effect a veto for 
each party
is it not ?
We all agreed to avoid this.
 
Would a sufficient threshold not be a simple majority in both houses?
Then binding policy would simply be defined as passing both houses and being 
within the
picket fence ?
Would that work?
 
Philip
 
 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy