[gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concept
- To: <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] New GNSO Reform Concept
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:21:55 +0200
On PDP thresholds,
the 2/3 in both houses requirement for consensus policy is in effect a veto for
is it not ?
We all agreed to avoid this.
Would a sufficient threshold not be a simple majority in both houses?
Then binding policy would simply be defined as passing both houses and being
picket fence ?
Would that work?