ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consensus-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-consensus-wg] out of scope PDP

  • To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] out of scope PDP
  • From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:44:15 +0200 (CEST)

Chuck, please find a propoal that does not conflcit with the no veto
principle (removals excepted) and you will have support. Why not the same
as our new supermajority rule ?
Philip



> Thanks Jon.  I would like to see responses to my suggestion for
> initiating an out-of-scope PDP.
>
> Chuck
>
>       On 4c, it seems that we are lowering the threshold of initiating
> an out-of-scope PDP.  Why would we do that?  A legitimate question from
> the RyC is why we would ever even consider initiating a PDP that is out
> of scope so it would be our ideal position that we never do it.  But
> recognizing that others may not accept that and being aware of the very
> late hour in our process, I would suggest that we make this threshold
> 2/3 of both houses.  Is there any opposition to that?
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy