[gnso-consensus-wg] out of scope PDP

[philip.sheppard@xxxxxx]

Chuck, please find a propoal that does not conflcit with the no veto
principle (removals excepted) and you will have support. Why not the same
as our new supermajority rule ?
Philip



> Thanks Jon.  I would like to see responses to my suggestion for
> initiating an out-of-scope PDP.
>
> Chuck
>
>       On 4c, it seems that we are lowering the threshold of initiating
> an out-of-scope PDP.  Why would we do that?  A legitimate question from
> the RyC is why we would ever even consider initiating a PDP that is out
> of scope so it would be our ideal position that we never do it.  But
> recognizing that others may not accept that and being aware of the very
> late hour in our process, I would suggest that we make this threshold
> 2/3 of both houses.  Is there any opposition to that?
>
>