<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] More Updated Draft
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] More Updated Draft
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:11:35 +0200
i will not be able to support a consensus decision that has only 2
nomcom reps.
no leeway on that today, just as there wasn't yesterday.
a.
-----Original Message-----
Bc can support most of below wih exception of GNSO chair.
The concept of default chair in case of disagreement is not needed.
Nom com shold serve council not the other way around.
We can only support GNSO chair elected from within GNSO.
(That may as today include the two nom com reps)
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|