ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consensus-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] User/Non-Contracted Party vs Registrant

  • To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] User/Non-Contracted Party vs Registrant
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:11:50 +0200


Gee, i thought people were still trying to reach consensus.

if it is closed, then it is closed.

never mind.

a.

On 25 Jul 2008, at 17:04, Milton L Mueller wrote:

Alan,
My understanding was that you were not convinced that we even had a consensus report to submit. Have you changed your position?

I think most of us involved here would be happy to include “user” rather than “registrant” but why should the group give you something you want in the report if your ultimate position is that we have no consensus and hence, no real report? I would say you would need to make a choice whether you are part of the “white smoke” coalition and if you are not it seems odd to be making demands about fundamental principles that should go into the report.

From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:58 AM
To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] User/Non-Contracted Party vs Registrant
Importance: High

I have said this a number of times, and we have agreed to it in principle, but it never seems to make it into a draft.

The Board adopted a large part of the BGC report, and this (according to Roberto Gaetano) INCLUDED the definition of what we are now calling Users or Non-Contracted Parties. This definition is Registrant.

Now because most of us happen to own (lease?) domains, we are often technically registrants. But that is not how we see ourselves in most of our discussions.

The current By-Laws talk about Commercial and Non-Commercial USERS. The adopted BGC report changed that.

To make sure that the Board reverts to the current definition, it must be EXPLICITLY in our report. A simple statement such as "The definition of the Non-Contracted House should be that of USER and NON-CONTRACTED PARTY, and not the more restrictive "REGISTRANT".

Alan





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy