Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] User/Non-Contracted Party vs Registrant

[philip.sheppard@xxxxxx]

Bc fully supports this correction.

> I have said this a number of times, and we have agreed to it in
> principle, but it never seems to make it into a draft.
>
> The Board adopted a large part of the BGC report, and this (according
> to Roberto Gaetano) INCLUDED the definition of what we are now
> calling Users or Non-Contracted Parties. This definition is Registrant.
>
> Now because most of us happen to own (lease?) domains, we are often
> technically registrants. But that is not how we see ourselves in most
> of our discussions.
>
> The current By-Laws talk about Commercial and Non-Commercial USERS.
> The adopted BGC report changed that.
>
> To make sure that the Board reverts to the current definition, it
> must be EXPLICITLY in our report.  A simple statement such as "The
> definition of the Non-Contracted House should be that of USER and
> NON-CONTRACTED PARTY, and not the more restrictive "REGISTRANT".
>
> Alan