<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] "Deliberations Closed"
- To: "Robert Hoggarth" <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
 
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] "Deliberations Closed"
 
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:04:58 -0400
 
 
 
I don't think we should take anything out where there are two or less
objections; simply note the minority position.
 
Chuck
________________________________
        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
        Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:40 PM
        To: Avri Doria
        Cc: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] "Deliberations Closed" 
        
        
        No.  I should have typed -  we'll take them out of the "draft"
package.  Sorry.  Thanks for the opportunity to clarify. 
        
        RobH
        
        
        On 7/25/08 9:33 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
        
        
                
                
                On 25 Jul 2008, at 18:25, Robert Hoggarth wrote:
                
                > As agreed if there is not consensus on specific points
we'll take
                > them out of the final package.
                
                so we will not know what is in the final package until
you send it?
                
                a.
                
                
                
                
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |