Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Your 0300 UDT deadline will be met by me *IF* there are no 
substantive changes in your report (and council size determination 
*IS* substantive).  I have a dinner party starting in a few minutes 
that I am cooking for, but will skip out in time to meet your 
deadline. And then I sleep for more than 5 hours for the first time in weeks.
If the Board is arrogant enough to say they will throw all this out 
if we miss the deadline by a few hours or a day, then perhaps I am 
volunteering with the wrong organization.
Sorry for being so blunt, but that is how I feel at the moment.

Alan

At 25/07/2008 07:20 PM, Robert Hoggarth wrote:
> All:
>
> Since I can't reply to directly to Philip's unilateral request 
> directly, I look to the rest of you for insight.  I am willing to 
> acknowledge that 2339PDT still meets the Board deadline, but any 
> request granted one should be granted to all. I'm still processing 
> edits due to some word processing challenges.  Moreover, everyone 
> was given full opportunity to comment on the document review 
> schedule. If Philip has last minute concerns, then East Coast U.S. 
> Group members will likely be asleep and not able to respond. Others 
> are preparing to go to sleep or already asleep. Any thoughts on the 
> fair/appropriate alternative here?
> RobH
>
>
> On 7/25/08 3:39 PM, "Philip Sheppard" 
> <<philip.sheppard@xxxxxxx>philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Rob, its is now 01.40 in the morning my time zone, Iam going o bed.
>
> I request the right to review the final report in 8 hours time.
>
> My reading of the Board is that this request is supportable.
>
> Philip