RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am okay with that as well.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
        Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 7:33 PM
        To: Robert Hoggarth; Philip Sheppard;
gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group
Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC
        
        
        I believe we have achieved substantial consensus but that, as we
all acknowledge, it is not a complete package, and if, under the
circumstances, anyone needs to disclaim acquiescence in a particular
provision in the package that is ultimately submitted, there will be an
opportunity to do so. In other words, no one is being asked to take a
blood oath to every word of a document they have not seen. 
         
        Secure in that belief (whether or not well-founded), I am happy
for Philip to have a look at the document 7 hours from now, if that is
feasible for Rob, but I will not be awake to review any change at that
time!  
         
        Steve
         
         
         
         

________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
        Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 7:20 PM
        To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group
Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC
        
        
        All:
        
        Since I can't reply to directly to Philip's unilateral request
directly, I look to the rest of you for insight.  I am willing to
acknowledge that 2339PDT still meets the Board deadline, but any request
granted one should be granted to all. I'm still processing edits due to
some word processing challenges.  Moreover, everyone was given full
opportunity to comment on the document review schedule. If Philip has
last minute concerns, then East Coast U.S. Group members will likely be
asleep and not able to respond. Others are preparing to go to sleep or
already asleep. Any thoughts on the fair/appropriate alternative here?
        
        RobH
        
        
        On 7/25/08 3:39 PM, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
wrote:
        
        

                Rob, its is now 01.40 in the morning my time zone, Iam
going o bed.
                
                I request the right to review the final report in 8
hours time.
                
                My reading of the Board is that this request is
supportable.
                
                Philip