RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report - Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC

[<tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx>]

On that basis I'd also appreciate the ability to give it a final look
over. Its now 01.05 in the UK and I'm calling it a day.
 
Tony
 
 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: 26 July 2008 01:00
To: Alan Greenberg; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report -
Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC




Rob:
My advice is to follow your original schedule, try to revise based on
existing comments, do what you can to anticipate Philip's concerns as
best you can, and hope that nothing's wrong when we give Philip his look
in the morning. If something is seriously awry at that point (and Philip
should know that it needs to be serious) you tell the Board we've
basically got an agreement but we need another day.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Fri 7/25/2008 7:33 PM
To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] First Draft Consensus Group Report -
Responses Please By 1900PDT-300UTC

Your 0300 UDT deadline will be met by me *IF* there are no
substantive changes in your report (and council size determination
*IS* substantive).  I have a dinner party starting in a few minutes
that I am cooking for, but will skip out in time to meet your
deadline. And then I sleep for more than 5 hours for the first time in
weeks.

If the Board is arrogant enough to say they will throw all this out
if we miss the deadline by a few hours or a day, then perhaps I am
volunteering with the wrong organization.

Sorry for being so blunt, but that is how I feel at the moment.

Alan

At 25/07/2008 07:20 PM, Robert Hoggarth wrote:
>All:
>
>Since I can't reply to directly to Philip's unilateral request
>directly, I look to the rest of you for insight.  I am willing to
>acknowledge that 2339PDT still meets the Board deadline, but any
>request granted one should be granted to all. I'm still processing
>edits due to some word processing challenges.  Moreover, everyone
>was given full opportunity to comment on the document review
>schedule. If Philip has last minute concerns, then East Coast U.S.
>Group members will likely be asleep and not able to respond. Others
>are preparing to go to sleep or already asleep. Any thoughts on the
>fair/appropriate alternative here?
>
>RobH
>
>
>On 7/25/08 3:39 PM, "Philip Sheppard"
><<philip.sheppard@xxxxxxx>philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Rob, its is now 01.40 in the morning my time zone, Iam going o bed.
>
>I request the right to review the final report in 8 hours time.
>
>My reading of the Board is that this request is supportable.
>
>Philip
>