<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Consensus Group Report
- To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Consensus Group Report
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:29:45 +0200
Hi,
Just do everyone knows, the NCA delegate is instructed to remove
support for the consensus if this point is pushed.
a.
On 26 Jul 2008, at 08:21, philip.sheppard@xxxxxx wrote:
Rob, everyone, thanks for the final time.
BC is fine with the fnal draft save the one issue i thought I had been
clear on - the third nom com which we do not support.
See attached.
Good effort all round.
Philip<Second_Draft_Consens_23B6CE - BC EDIT.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|