<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
- To: "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
- From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:42:29 +1000
I'm OK with Steve's proposed wording but you should hear from ALAC Chair
rest of ExCom et.al. to see if they agree with me ;-)
Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)
On 15 July 2011 12:52, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks, Rosemary. I believe the Objective should be amended to clarify
> that each AC/SO may act on the WG report in its own way. Some may endorse,
> others may comment or modify before sending to the board, and some might
> reject it.
>
> You wrote:
>
> To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for
> their consideration. The Working Group Report would, if approved by the
> respective SO/ACs, would then be forwarded to the Board as the “Advice” in
> response to the Board Resolution
>
>
> Proposed Alternative:
>
>
> To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for
> their consideration. The Working Group Report would be considered by
> GNSO, ccNSO, and ALAC for forwarding to the ICANN Board as “Advice”
> responsive to the Board Resolution. Each AC/SO may act independently on
> the Working Group Report, and may endorse all, part, or none of the report
> recommendations.
>
> --
> Steve DelBianco
> Executive Director
> NetChoice
> http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
> +1.202.420.7482
>
>
> On 7/14/11 9:40 PM, "Rosemary Sinclair" <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've suggested one small amendment in the doc
>
> the report would be given to all Chartering Organisations (as the Board
> has asked Acs/SOs for advice ) not just GNSO unless only GNSO approves a
> WG...
>
> What do you think?
>
> I'm also looking for a seconder for the motion...
>
> On another topic - I guess there will be a role for ccNSO Liasion and
> ALAC liasion to take whatever is decided at GNSO back to their groups (as
> Board has asked all of us for advice....)
>
> Cheers
>
> Rosemary
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx [
> owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam [
> Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:51 AM
> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
>
> Dear All-
>
> Per Rosemary’s request, please find a draft charter for your review and
> consideration. The attached document uses the new template that Staff has
> recently developed based on the GNSO Council’s Working Group Guidelines.
>
> All the Best,
>
> Margie
> _______
>
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _______
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|