ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consumercci-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group

  • To: "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
  • From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:42:29 +1000

I'm OK  with Steve's  proposed wording  but you should hear from ALAC Chair
 rest of ExCom et.al. to see if they agree with me ;-)



Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 15 July 2011 12:52, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>   Thanks, Rosemary.  I believe the Objective should be amended to clarify
> that each AC/SO may act on the WG report in its own way.  Some may endorse,
> others may comment or modify before sending to the board, and some might
> reject it.
>
>   You wrote:
>
>  To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for
> their consideration.   The Working Group Report would, if approved by the
> respective SO/ACs, would then be forwarded to the Board as the “Advice” in
> response to the Board Resolution
>
>
>   Proposed Alternative:
>
>
>  To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for
> their consideration.   The Working Group Report would be considered by
> GNSO, ccNSO, and ALAC for forwarding to the ICANN Board as “Advice”
> responsive to the Board Resolution.   Each AC/SO may act independently on
> the Working Group Report, and may endorse all, part, or none of the report
> recommendations.
>
>    --
> Steve DelBianco
> Executive Director
> NetChoice
> http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
> +1.202.420.7482
>
>
>   On 7/14/11 9:40 PM, "Rosemary Sinclair" <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   Hi
>
>  I've suggested one small amendment in the doc
>
>  the report would be given to all Chartering Organisations (as the Board
> has asked Acs/SOs for advice ) not just GNSO unless only GNSO approves a
> WG...
>
>  What do you think?
>
>  I'm also looking for a seconder for the motion...
>
>  On another topic - I guess there will be a role for ccNSO Liasion and
> ALAC liasion to take whatever is decided at GNSO back to their groups (as
> Board has asked all of us for advice....)
>
>  Cheers
>
>  Rosemary
>
>
>  ________________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx [
> owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam [
> Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:51 AM
> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group
>
>  Dear All-
>
>  Per Rosemary’s request, please find a draft charter for your review and
> consideration.   The attached document uses the new template that Staff has
> recently developed based on the GNSO Council’s Working Group Guidelines.
>
>  All the Best,
>
>  Margie
> _______
>
>  Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _______
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy