RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group

[Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm good with Steve's suggestion....it takes me closer to where I think we need 
to be. 

cheers

Rosemary
________________________________________
From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 1:42 PM
To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Rosemary Sinclair; Margie Milam
Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group

I'm OK  with Steve's  proposed wording  but you should hear from ALAC Chair  
rest of ExCom et.al<http://et.al>. to see if they agree with me ;-)



Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 15 July 2011 12:52, Steve DelBianco 
<sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Thanks, Rosemary.  I believe the Objective should be amended to clarify that 
each AC/SO may act on the WG report in its own way.  Some may endorse, others 
may comment or modify before sending to the board, and some might reject it.

You wrote:
To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for their 
consideration.   The Working Group Report would, if approved by the respective 
SO/ACs, would then be forwarded to the Board as the “Advice” in response to the 
Board Resolution

Proposed Alternative:

To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for their 
consideration.   The Working Group Report would be considered by GNSO, ccNSO, 
and ALAC for forwarding to the ICANN Board as “Advice” responsive to the Board 
Resolution.   Each AC/SO may act independently on the Working Group Report, and 
may endorse all, part, or none of the report recommendations.


--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482


On 7/14/11 9:40 PM, "Rosemary Sinclair" 
<rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Hi

I've suggested one small amendment in the doc

the report would be given to all Chartering Organisations (as the Board has 
asked Acs/SOs for advice ) not just GNSO unless only GNSO approves a WG...

What do you think?

I'm also looking for a seconder for the motion...

On another topic - I guess there will be a role for ccNSO Liasion and ALAC 
liasion to take whatever is decided at GNSO back to their groups (as Board has 
asked all of us for advice....)

Cheers

Rosemary


________________________________________
From: 
owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Margie Milam 
[Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:51 AM
To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group

Dear All-

Per Rosemary’s request, please find a draft charter for your review and 
consideration.   The attached document uses the new template that Staff has 
recently developed based on the GNSO Council’s Working Group Guidelines.

All the Best,

Margie
_______

Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______