RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group

[<HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I also like the charter as amended by Steve.
Debbie




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosemary
Sinclair
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:46 PM
To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr; gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Margie Milam
Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working
Group


I'm good with Steve's suggestion....it takes me closer to where I think
we need to be. 

cheers

Rosemary
________________________________________
From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 1:42 PM
To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Rosemary Sinclair; Margie Milam
Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] RE: Draft Charter for the CCI Working
Group

I'm OK  with Steve's  proposed wording  but you should hear from ALAC
Chair  rest of ExCom et.al<http://et.al>. to see if they agree with me
;-)



Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 15 July 2011 12:52, Steve DelBianco
<sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Thanks, Rosemary.  I believe the Objective should be amended to clarify
that each AC/SO may act on the WG report in its own way.  Some may
endorse, others may comment or modify before sending to the board, and
some might reject it.

You wrote:
To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for
their consideration.   The Working Group Report would, if approved by
the respective SO/ACs, would then be forwarded to the Board as the
"Advice" in response to the Board Resolution

Proposed Alternative:

To produce a Working Group Report to be given to each of the AC/SOs for
their consideration.   The Working Group Report would be considered by
GNSO, ccNSO, and ALAC for forwarding to the ICANN Board as "Advice"
responsive to the Board Resolution.   Each AC/SO may act independently
on the Working Group Report, and may endorse all, part, or none of the
report recommendations.


--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482


On 7/14/11 9:40 PM, "Rosemary Sinclair"
<rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:

Hi

I've suggested one small amendment in the doc

the report would be given to all Chartering Organisations (as the Board
has asked Acs/SOs for advice ) not just GNSO unless only GNSO approves a
WG...

What do you think?

I'm also looking for a seconder for the motion...

On another topic - I guess there will be a role for ccNSO Liasion and
ALAC liasion to take whatever is decided at GNSO back to their groups
(as Board has asked all of us for advice....)

Cheers

Rosemary


________________________________________
From:
owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@ica
nn.org>
[owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@ic
ann.org>] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
[Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 6:51 AM
To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Draft Charter for the CCI Working Group

Dear All-

Per Rosemary's request, please find a draft charter for your review and
consideration.   The attached document uses the new template that Staff
has recently developed based on the GNSO Council's Working Group
Guidelines.

All the Best,

Margie
_______

Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______