ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consumercci-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-consumercci-dt] Fwd: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)

  • To: "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Fwd: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 7 on the motions page)
  • From: Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:15:03 +1000

Cheers

Rosemary

Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490

Begin forwarded message:

From: Rosemary Sinclair 
<rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 23 September 2011 4:36:01 AM GMT+08:00
To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] Friendly Amendments to CCI WG Motion and Charter (motion 
7 on the motions page)

I'm OK with these amendments except re the Update ....we will be in a position 
to provide an Update (not a report) at Dakar

So the amendment at Resolved 5 could be ...WG Update.....at Dakar.....

Cheers

Rosemary

Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413 734490

On 23/09/2011, at 2:53 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>> 
wrote:


Rosemary and Wolf,

I appreciate the amendment to the CCI WG motion to delete the word
"joint." I have a few other intended friendly amendments to the motion
and the Charter to be sure there is no confusion or doubt that this is a
GNSO chartered WG, which are always open to all interested parties
regardless of SO/AC affiliation, and to address concerns regarding the
timing of the report.

Friendly amendments to the motion:

1. Replace "of these SO/ACs" with "party" in the third/last Whereas.

2. Replace "at the ICANN Dakar Meeting in October, 2011" with "as soon
after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible" in the fifth
(second to last) Resolve. At this point in time it doesn't seem likely
that this WG can form, select a chair, have substantive discussions,
etc. and still produce a report by Dakar.

3. Strike the last Resolve entirely.

Friendly amendments to the Charter:

1. Title: change to "GNSO Working Group (WG) Charter."

2. Chartering Organization(s): change to "GNSO" only.

3. Deliverables & Timeframes: change "by the ICANN Dakar Meeting" to "as
soon after the ICANN Dakar Meeting as reasonably possible."

4. Membership Criteria: change to "The CCI WG will be open to all
interested parties."

5. Group Formation, Dependencies, & Dissolution: change to "This WG will
be formed as a GNSO chartered Working Group."

Finally, just a comment. I guess it works, but it seems redundant to
include excerpts from the GNSO WG Guidelines. IMO, charters should
simply state that those Guidelines apply and go into detail only where
it is proposing a departure from those guidelines with appropriate
reasoning.

Thanks,
Tim





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy