Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] CCCI Public Comment

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for this advice/update Berry,

I'm OK with that approach  and it allows for other AC's and perhaps even
the other SO's to use that PC  as an input point  on this issue  from their
membership or constituencies  perspective, in a way that is perhaps
more synchronous that the alternate...



Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 10 November 2011 03:05, Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> During the CCCI Session at Dakar there was a discussion about when to
> conduct a public comment period before or after submission of the Final
> Report to the GNSO Council.  Staff was asked if the GNSO Council
> deliberations stated a preference.  After review of the minutes and motion,
> the Council did not discuss specifics regarding a public comment period for
> this activity.  Working Groups normally do not need GNSO Council approval
> to post a report for public comment and as such the CCCI WG may determine
> on its own when and where to do so.****
>
> ** **
>
> The session in Dakar seemed to show consensus of producing the final
> report, posting for public comment and then submit the final, final report
> to the GNSO Council.  If that is the WG’s preference, nothing appears to
> counter that course.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Berry Cobb****
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Email: *mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Tel: +1 720 839 5735
> Skype ID: berry.cobb****
>
> ** **
>