<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer Metrics call
- To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer Metrics call
- From: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:13:52 -0500
I am on an unplanned trip (a day early) and will miss the call.
My apologies
Berard
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 3, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here are some thoughts about our discussion on today's working group call.
>
> There is still only one public comment posted so far. (link)
>
> We can discuss outcomes from the Costa Rica public session on Wed
> 14-Mar-2012.
>
> This page (link) includes our presentation and 49 page transcript of the
> lively discussion we had. Board member Bruce Tonkin was there, and seemed
> to generally agree with how we have responded to his resolution.
>
> You can review the audio cast here, http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29645
>
> Attached are additional notes that Jonathan Robinson compiled during the
> session.
>
> Below is a note from Jonathan back on 6-Mar, raising a good question about
> the way ICANN has framed the call for public comments.
>
>
> From: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:32:33 +0000
> To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer
> Metrics
>
> All,
>
> Checking back on this, the public comment note says:
>
> This Public Comment solicitation represents an opportunity to share
> perspectives on the proposed definitions of Consumer, Consumer Trust,
> Consumer Choice, and Competition with in the draft Advice Letter. The CCTC
> Working Group will host a public session in Costa Rica and the close of the
> comment period will extend after the meeting to allow the community adequate
> time for comment.
>
> Surely we are seeking more than simply input on the proposed definitions but
> on all of the content in the advice letter?
> “ … with in … is a small typo”
>
> The one response to the Public Comment period so far has also taken this to
> be the case.
>
> Am I missing something obvious here?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
> Sent: 24 February 2012 01:54
> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer Metrics
>
> Team,
>
> We are live! Here is the link to the public comment announcement.
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/cctc-draft-advice-letter-23feb12-en.htm
>
> Thank you all for your dedicated work.
>
> B
>
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 720.839.5735
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> @berrycobb
>
>
> <CCI Meeting Notes[1].docx>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|