RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer Metrics call

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Apology noted John, thank you for notifying us.

Nathalie

From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Berard
Sent: mardi 3 avril 2012 16:14
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: Consumer CCI DT
Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer 
Metrics call

I am on an unplanned trip (a day early) and will miss the call.

My apologies

Berard

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 3, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Steve DelBianco 
<sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Here are some thoughts about our discussion on today's working group call.

There is still only one public comment posted so far. 
(link<http://forum.icann.org/lists/cctc-draft-advice-letter/>)

We can discuss outcomes from the Costa Rica public session on Wed 14-Mar-2012.

This page (link<http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29645%20>) includes our 
presentation and 49 page transcript of the lively discussion we had.   Board 
member Bruce Tonkin was there, and seemed to generally agree with how we have 
responded to his resolution.

 You can review the audio cast here, http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29645

Attached are additional notes that Jonathan Robinson compiled during the 
session.

Below is a note from Jonathan back on 6-Mar, raising a good question about the 
way ICANN has framed the call for public comments.


From: Jonathan Robinson 
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:32:33 +0000
To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
<gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer 
Metrics

All,

Checking back on this, the public comment note says:

This Public Comment solicitation represents an opportunity to share 
perspectives on the proposed definitions of Consumer, Consumer Trust, Consumer 
Choice, and Competition with in the draft Advice Letter. The CCTC Working Group 
will host a public session in Costa Rica and the close of the comment period 
will extend after the meeting to allow the community adequate time for comment.



Surely we are seeking more than simply input on the proposed definitions but on 
all of the content in the advice letter?
“ … with in … is a small typo”

The one response to the Public Comment period so far has also taken this to be 
the case.

Am I missing something obvious here?

Thanks,


Jonathan

From: 
owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: 24 February 2012 01:54
To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer Metrics

Team,

We are live!  Here is the link to the public comment announcement.

http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/cctc-draft-advice-letter-23feb12-en.htm

Thank you all for your dedicated work.

B

Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb


<CCI Meeting Notes[1].docx>