Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer Metrics call

[Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have a conflicting call. Apologies.

--Wendy

On 04/03/2012 11:01 AM, Nathalie Peregrine wrote:
> Apology noted John, thank you for notifying us.
> 
> Nathalie
> 
> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Berard
> Sent: mardi 3 avril 2012 16:14
> To: Steve DelBianco
> Cc: Consumer CCI DT
> Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer 
> Metrics call
> 
> I am on an unplanned trip (a day early) and will miss the call.
> 
> My apologies
> 
> Berard
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Steve DelBianco 
> <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Here are some thoughts about our discussion on today's working group call.
> 
> There is still only one public comment posted so far. 
> (link<http://forum.icann.org/lists/cctc-draft-advice-letter/>)
> 
> We can discuss outcomes from the Costa Rica public session on Wed 14-Mar-2012.
> 
> This page (link<http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29645%20>) includes our 
> presentation and 49 page transcript of the lively discussion we had.   Board 
> member Bruce Tonkin was there, and seemed to generally agree with how we have 
> responded to his resolution.
> 
>  You can review the audio cast here, http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29645
> 
> Attached are additional notes that Jonathan Robinson compiled during the 
> session.
> 
> Below is a note from Jonathan back on 6-Mar, raising a good question about 
> the way ICANN has framed the call for public comments.
> 
> 
> From: Jonathan Robinson 
> <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:32:33 +0000
> To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
> <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer 
> Metrics
> 
> All,
> 
> Checking back on this, the public comment note says:
> 
> This Public Comment solicitation represents an opportunity to share 
> perspectives on the proposed definitions of Consumer, Consumer Trust, 
> Consumer Choice, and Competition with in the draft Advice Letter. The CCTC 
> Working Group will host a public session in Costa Rica and the close of the 
> comment period will extend after the meeting to allow the community adequate 
> time for comment.
> 
> 
> 
> Surely we are seeking more than simply input on the proposed definitions but 
> on all of the content in the advice letter?
> “ … with in … is a small typo”
> 
> The one response to the Public Comment period so far has also taken this to 
> be the case.
> 
> Am I missing something obvious here?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> From: 
> owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>  [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
> Sent: 24 February 2012 01:54
> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer Metrics
> 
> Team,
> 
> We are live!  Here is the link to the public comment announcement.
> 
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/cctc-draft-advice-letter-23feb12-en.htm
> 
> Thank you all for your dedicated work.
> 
> B
> 
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 720.839.5735
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> @berrycobb
> 
> 
> <CCI Meeting Notes[1].docx>


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613
Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://wendy.seltzer.org/
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/