RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer Metrics call
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer Metrics call
- From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:29:53 -0700
Thank you for this, apology noted.
[mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
Sent: mardi 3 avril 2012 18:16
To: Nathalie Peregrine
Cc: Consumer CCI DT
Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer
I have a conflicting call. Apologies.
On 04/03/2012 11:01 AM, Nathalie Peregrine wrote:
> Apology noted John, thank you for notifying us.
> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Berard
> Sent: mardi 3 avril 2012 16:14
> To: Steve DelBianco
> Cc: Consumer CCI DT
> Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's
> Consumer Metrics call
> I am on an unplanned trip (a day early) and will miss the call.
> My apologies
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Steve DelBianco
> <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Here are some thoughts about our discussion on today's working group call.
> There is still only one public comment posted so far.
> We can discuss outcomes from the Costa Rica public session on Wed 14-Mar-2012.
> This page (link<http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29645%20>) includes our
> presentation and 49 page transcript of the lively discussion we had. Board
> member Bruce Tonkin was there, and seemed to generally agree with how we have
> responded to his resolution.
> You can review the audio cast here,
> Attached are additional notes that Jonathan Robinson compiled during the
> Below is a note from Jonathan back on 6-Mar, raising a good question about
> the way ICANN has framed the call for public comments.
> From: Jonathan Robinson
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:32:33 +0000
> To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>,
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement -
> Consumer Metrics
> Checking back on this, the public comment note says:
> This Public Comment solicitation represents an opportunity to share
> perspectives on the proposed definitions of Consumer, Consumer Trust,
> Consumer Choice, and Competition with in the draft Advice Letter. The CCTC
> Working Group will host a public session in Costa Rica and the close of the
> comment period will extend after the meeting to allow the community adequate
> time for comment.
> Surely we are seeking more than simply input on the proposed definitions but
> on all of the content in the advice letter?
> " ... with in ... is a small typo"
> The one response to the Public Comment period so far has also taken this to
> be the case.
> Am I missing something obvious here?
> cann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Berry Cobb
> Sent: 24 February 2012 01:54
> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer
> We are live! Here is the link to the public comment announcement.
> Thank you all for your dedicated work.
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> <CCI Meeting Notes.docx>
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613 Fellow, Yale Law School
Information Society Project Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at
Harvard University http://wendy.seltzer.org/ https://www.chillingeffects.org/