RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer Metrics call

["Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

 

Many thanks Steve and for including my notes.  As you will have seen, Berry
has already covered off the response to my note below.

Dropping like flies . I may not be able to make the call!

 

Am working with the Registries SG on comment.  RySG will certainly submit
comment and it is likely to cover many of the points covered on my note from
Costa Rica.

 

Best wishes,

 

 

Jonathan

 

From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
Sent: 03 April 2012 14:51
To: Consumer CCI DT
Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Items for discussion on today's Consumer
Metrics call

 

Here are some thoughts about our discussion on today's working group call.

 

There is still only one public comment posted so far. (link
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/cctc-draft-advice-letter/> )

 

We can discuss outcomes from the Costa Rica public session on Wed
14-Mar-2012.  

 

This page (link <http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29645%20> ) includes our
presentation and 49 page transcript of the lively discussion we had.   Board
member Bruce Tonkin was there, and seemed to generally agree with how we
have responded to his resolution.

 

 You can review the audio cast here, http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29645


 

Attached are additional notes that Jonathan Robinson compiled during the
session.

 

Below is a note from Jonathan back on 6-Mar, raising a good question about
the way ICANN has framed the call for public comments. 

 

 

From: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:32:33 +0000
To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer
Metrics

 

All,

 

Checking back on this, the public comment note says:

 


This Public Comment solicitation represents an opportunity to share
perspectives on the proposed definitions of Consumer, Consumer Trust,
Consumer Choice, and Competition with in the draft Advice Letter. The CCTC
Working Group will host a public session in Costa Rica and the close of the
comment period will extend after the meeting to allow the community adequate
time for comment.

                                

 

Surely we are seeking more than simply input on the proposed definitions but
on all of the content in the advice letter?

" . with in . is a small typo"

 

The one response to the Public Comment period so far has also taken this to
be the case.

 

Am I missing something obvious here?

 

Thanks,

 

 

Jonathan

 

From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: 24 February 2012 01:54
To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Public Comment Announcement - Consumer
Metrics

 

Team,

 

We are live!  Here is the link to the public comment announcement.

 

http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/cctc-draft-advice-letter-23feb12-en.h
tm

 

Thank you all for your dedicated work.

 

B

 

Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

@berrycobb