ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-consumercci-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague

  • To: Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:09:52 +0200

Hi Rosemary,

Can you please clarify the intent of your group on this for me?

Do you plan to forward a status report or some other kind of document 
summarizing the group's work so far and requesting action of the GNSO Council 
towards the GAC?

Also, I think it would be very useful to plan a session in Prague, during the 
GNSO working weekend, to update the Council on your work and plan next steps.

Thoughts?

Stéphane



Le 18 mai 2012 à 16:38, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :

> 
> Sorry, one other thing to keep in mind that the GAC/GSNO Council time is 
> usually for addressing topics that have been addressed by the entire council 
> as opposed to working groups within the Council.  Therefore, whatever is 
> discussed with the GAC should be discussed within the Council sessions first 
> and reflect those discussions (as opposed to just the Working Group 
> discussions).  
> 
> 
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:19 AM
> To: Rosemary Sinclair; john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Berry Cobb; gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> I am not saying we shouldn't have this as a topic...we should and they did 
> suggest it. But we have very limited time with the GAC and a number of topics 
> to address.  Therefore the maximum amount of time we probably have on this 
> section is likely to be a total of 15 minutes.  Therefore, having this time 
> to do a full report followed by a Q and A is probably not going to be doable. 
>  I suggest therefore that you narrow down the topic to certain questions so a 
> dialogue can take place and invite them to another workshop in Prague where 
> the topic can be covered more in depth.
> 
> Does that make sense?
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rosemary Sinclair [mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 9:07 PM
> To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Neuman, Jeff; Berry Cobb; gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
> 
> Hi all
> 
> I have action to write note to Stephane on this very topic of GNSO reaching 
> out to GAC on this work
> 
> Will circulate to our WG for discussion next Tues and then to Chair, GNSO 
> Council
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Rosemary
> 
> Rosemary Sinclair
> Director, External Relations
> Australian School of Business
> UNSW
> +61 413 734490
> 
> On 18/05/2012, at 4:43 AM, "john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
> <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Jeff,
>> 
>> Berry may be able to phrase it more eloquently, but the matter of 
>> Consumer Metrics ought to be on our agenda.
>> 
>> The Council should offer a report on the work so far in setting the 
>> definitions and metrics for Consumer Confidence, Competition and Trust 
>> that results from the requirements of the Affirmation of Commitments.
>> 
>> As you know, the GAC has a keen interest in this subject and it would 
>> be useful to our working relationship to showcase the progress made.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> John Berard
>> Founder
>> Credible Context
>> 58 West Portal Avenue, #291
>> San Francisco, CA 94127
>> m: 415.845.4388
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
>> From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 9:23 am
>> To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> I am responsible for collecting the list of topics to be discussed 
>> during that session.  Can you please give me a one or two sentence 
>> description of what you would like to discuss and how much time you 
>> believe it will take?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
>> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:46 AM
>> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
>> Importance: High
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Team,
>> 
>> It is confirmed that there will be a GNSO/GAC session in Prague.  
>> There is already an agenda forming and if we want Consumer Metrics 
>> topic on the agenda, we need to expedite the request.
>> 
>> I also learned that the GAC has already contacted the GNSO stating 
>> their interest on the Consumer Metrics topic.  However, John Berard, 
>> as our Council Liaison, should send a note to the GNSO Council 
>> requesting this be added to the proposed agenda.  The Council will 
>> have to agree that this is a topic they wish to discuss.  I suspect it 
>> will be fairly easy for the Council to approve this topic for the 
>> agenda.  The only concern will be time allotted to discuss it.
>> 
>> John, can you send this notice to the Council ASAP?
>> 
>> Berry Cobb
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>> 720.839.5735
>> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> @berrycobb
>> 
>> 
> 
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy