Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague

[Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Stephane

A personal response.....

Our WG is meeting again tomorrow to:

1. Continue to work through the comments we have received...with a view to 
having our thoughts ready for discussion in Prague. I think ( subject to 
further discussion tomorrow) we will want to present to GNSO Council during 
Prague...a Draft Advice document which will be almost there but wanting to use 
Prague for last discussions before finalising our Draft Advice to go to GNSO 
and then to be made available to ccNSO, ALAC and GAC.

2. Discuss a draft letter to be sent from you ( recipient either GAC or ICANN 
Board  - to be agreed at WG level) asking for GAC to provide early feedback to 
the WG and hopefully before we send our final DRAFT ADVICE to GNSO as per our 
Charter. GNSO then needs to 1) consider this Draft Advice itself and 2) forward 
the Draft Advice to ccNSO, GAC and ALAC for their consideration and separate 
advice to the Board.

I will let you know after our meeting where the WG is up to.

We are keen to get early GAC advice on our Draft Advice if we can,  as we see 
the issues as key for GAC and it would be good to have some indication of their 
views. This will mean a discussion by GAC during the Prague meeting.

The WG is happy to provide more info for GAC at the meeting. The WG is also 
pleased to discuss progress with GNSO during the Working Sessions.

I should add that ALAC has been very involved in the Working Group but we are 
charterd by GNSO only. 

I hope this helps and will confirm the WG views for you as soon as I can

Cheers

Rosemary

Rosemary Sinclair
Director, External Relations
Australian School of Business
UNSW
+61 413734490(mobile)

On 21/05/2012, at 7:10 PM, "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> Hi Rosemary,
> 
> Can you please clarify the intent of your group on this for me?
> 
> Do you plan to forward a status report or some other kind of document 
> summarizing the group's work so far and requesting action of the GNSO Council 
> towards the GAC?
> 
> Also, I think it would be very useful to plan a session in Prague, during the 
> GNSO working weekend, to update the Council on your work and plan next steps.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> Le 18 mai 2012 à 16:38, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
> 
>> 
>> Sorry, one other thing to keep in mind that the GAC/GSNO Council time is 
>> usually for addressing topics that have been addressed by the entire council 
>> as opposed to working groups within the Council.  Therefore, whatever is 
>> discussed with the GAC should be discussed within the Council sessions first 
>> and reflect those discussions (as opposed to just the Working Group 
>> discussions).  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
>> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 10:19 AM
>> To: Rosemary Sinclair; john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Berry Cobb; gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
>> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> I am not saying we shouldn't have this as a topic...we should and they did 
>> suggest it. But we have very limited time with the GAC and a number of 
>> topics to address.  Therefore the maximum amount of time we probably have on 
>> this section is likely to be a total of 15 minutes.  Therefore, having this 
>> time to do a full report followed by a Q and A is probably not going to be 
>> doable.  I suggest therefore that you narrow down the topic to certain 
>> questions so a dialogue can take place and invite them to another workshop 
>> in Prague where the topic can be covered more in depth.
>> 
>> Does that make sense?
>> 
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rosemary Sinclair [mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
>> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 9:07 PM
>> To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Neuman, Jeff; Berry Cobb; gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
>> 
>> Hi all
>> 
>> I have action to write note to Stephane on this very topic of GNSO reaching 
>> out to GAC on this work
>> 
>> Will circulate to our WG for discussion next Tues and then to Chair, GNSO 
>> Council
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Rosemary
>> 
>> Rosemary Sinclair
>> Director, External Relations
>> Australian School of Business
>> UNSW
>> +61 413 734490
>> 
>> On 18/05/2012, at 4:43 AM, "john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
>> <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Jeff,
>>> 
>>> Berry may be able to phrase it more eloquently, but the matter of 
>>> Consumer Metrics ought to be on our agenda.
>>> 
>>> The Council should offer a report on the work so far in setting the 
>>> definitions and metrics for Consumer Confidence, Competition and Trust 
>>> that results from the requirements of the Affirmation of Commitments.
>>> 
>>> As you know, the GAC has a keen interest in this subject and it would 
>>> be useful to our working relationship to showcase the progress made.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> John Berard
>>> Founder
>>> Credible Context
>>> 58 West Portal Avenue, #291
>>> San Francisco, CA 94127
>>> m: 415.845.4388
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: RE: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
>>> From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 9:23 am
>>> To: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> I am responsible for collecting the list of topics to be discussed 
>>> during that session.  Can you please give me a one or two sentence 
>>> description of what you would like to discuss and how much time you 
>>> believe it will take?
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Jeffrey J. Neuman
>>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:46 AM
>>> To: gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] GNSO / GAC Session in Prague
>>> Importance: High
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Team,
>>> 
>>> It is confirmed that there will be a GNSO/GAC session in Prague.  
>>> There is already an agenda forming and if we want Consumer Metrics 
>>> topic on the agenda, we need to expedite the request.
>>> 
>>> I also learned that the GAC has already contacted the GNSO stating 
>>> their interest on the Consumer Metrics topic.  However, John Berard, 
>>> as our Council Liaison, should send a note to the GNSO Council 
>>> requesting this be added to the proposed agenda.  The Council will 
>>> have to agree that this is a topic they wish to discuss.  I suspect it 
>>> will be fairly easy for the Council to approve this topic for the 
>>> agenda.  The only concern will be time allotted to discuss it.
>>> 
>>> John, can you send this notice to the Council ASAP?
>>> 
>>> Berry Cobb
>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>>> 720.839.5735
>>> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> @berrycobb
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>