<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-consumercci-dt] Chat Transcript from Consumercci-dt meeting 22 May 2012
- To: "gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-consumercci-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-consumercci-dt] Chat Transcript from Consumercci-dt meeting 22 May 2012
- From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:15:59 -0700
Berry Cobb:Welcome to the 22 May 2012 Consumer Metrics Call.
Berry Cobb:Also apologies for Julie Hedlund and Wendy Seltzer
Nathalie Peregrine:JonathanZuck has joined the audio bridge
Nathalie Peregrine:Michael Graham has joined the AC room
Nathalie Peregrine:Olivier Crepin Leblond has joined the AC roo
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:Apologies for ariving late. I am still on another
call, ending in a couple of minutes
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:on now
Berry Cobb:http://reports.internic.net/cgi/registrars/problem-report.cgi
Steve DelBianco (BC):The USG comment asks for these metrics as part of
consumer trust: malware sites; sites used in botnets; sites associated with ID
theft, and with Spam; breach notices for misconduct of officers; security
breaches
Steve DelBianco (BC):of those, only Spam is included in the Internic
complaint form
Berry Cobb:Another perspeective that I recall, is that the complaint form
will allow for delination of a Registry Complaint vs. Registrar Complaint
Jonathan Zuck:Agree. This is just advice. Let's give it.
Steve DelBianco (BC):Berry -- please capture the thought that some of the
complaint "categorization" will need to be done by ICANN compliance folks, as
they do an initial review of a complaint
Jonathan Zuck:It's also probably worth noting that asking for data and being
refused has some rhetorical value as well
Steve DelBianco (BC):one definition, I think
Steve DelBianco (BC):does anyone know how many breach notices ICANN issued
last year?
Berry Cobb:http://www.icann.org/en/resources/compliance/notices
Jonathan Zuck:agree. so its' two percentages
Berry Cobb:looks like 14
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:hear hear
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:the problem is that the current "breach notices" are
very restricted in scope
Berry Cobb:http://www.icann.org/en/resources/compliance/notices/archive
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:so many incidents happen but few give rise to a breach
notice
Olivier Crepin-Leblond:hence my mentioning earlier on the call, to assume
that Compliance will expand its scope. This scope expansion will most likely
give rise to more breach notices being issued
Steve DelBianco (BC):i suggest we say "Significantly lower" instead of 50%
lower
Carlos:Sorry to be late, I am here after to escape to my today classes
Jonathan Zuck:sure, as a percentage
Jonathan Zuck:Makes sense
Steve DelBianco (BC):to clarify, these are relative to Registrations in new
vs legacy gTLDs
Rosemary:my phone battery has died! would Steve chair last few
minutes...apologies!
Rosemary:lost the call, apologies!
Jonathan Zuck:can we set a percentage like 5%
Jonathan Zuck:;)
Jonathan Zuck:registries in this case. only 5% receive breach notices
Jonathan Zuck:are we creating the wrong incentive for contract compliance
with these metrics?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|