RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FOR REVIEW: Draft PDP WG Charter

["Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Rudy,

I was really just looking for reasons why groups (and there could still be 
others) may be motivated to provide certain sorts of contact information.

As regards legal advice on translated information, I think we can only think 
about that once we've decided what (if anything) is to be translated.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From: Rudi Vansnick [mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 August 2013 11:23
To: Dillon, Chris
Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FOR REVIEW: Draft PDP WG Charter

Dear Julie,

Many thanks for the work you already did for this charter, it helps us a lot 
forward. Unfortunately the week was too short to be able to follow up on the 
document yet. However, the basis for the call today is here and I hope we will 
have some more participants, although it is bank holiday today and the start of 
a long weekend.

Chris,

With regards your comment
I'm not sure whether the following should be in the document, but I am 
interested in what is driving the need for inclusion of non-ASCII data, 
probably security considerations. I feel these are relevant, as they may help 
to motivate whoever ends up providing the additional data required for a new 
format. For example, there was/is a proposal for a traffic light system in 
which websites providing certain information could be considered more secure 
(greener) than those that didn't (redder).

I'm afraid we can not argument on what will be presented on a website or in an 
email as that's far away from the task and duty of ICANN. Content related 
material should not be considered here. We are only looking into the WHOIS data 
information, which of course for security reasons should be as correct as 
possible. When using translated contact details it is possible the address 
would be unrecognizable for legal perspective and as such disturb the legal 
processes. For instance, in Belgium, if an address is not correct all legal 
actions are stopped. And that's most probably in many countries the case. This 
relates also to the possible models adoptable in this context. And I'm just 
wondering if we should integrate in the charter some legal advise with regards 
the use of translated information in contact data ?

Rudi Vansnick
Chair NPOC Policy Committee - ICANN  - www.npoc.org<http://www.npoc.org/>

Mobile +32/(0)475/28.16.32 - Tel +32/(0)9/329.39.16
rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>



Op 14-aug.-2013, om 11:33 heeft "Dillon, Chris" 
<c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>> het volgende geschreven:


Dear Julie,

It's really great to have this draft so soon and it includes a really good 
summary of the documents and the procedures now necessary.

I'm not sure whether the following should be in the document, but I am 
interested in what is driving the need for inclusion of non-ASCII data, 
probably security considerations. I feel these are relevant, as they may help 
to motivate whoever ends up providing the additional data required for a new 
format. For example, there was/is a proposal for a traffic light system in 
which websites providing certain information could be considered more secure 
(greener) than those that didn't (redder).

I was interested to see all five models listed on p.4, but am curious about why 
one of the models was originally relegated to a note on the last page of 'The 
final issue report: translation and transliteration of contact information', 
whereas the other four models were fully developed in the report.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

From: 
owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
 
[mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 14 August 2013 00:04
To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] FOR REVIEW: Draft PDP WG Charter
Importance: High

Dear members of the Charter Drafting Team,

Per our actions below from our first meeting, attached you will find a draft 
charter for your review and for discussion at our next meeting on Thursday, 15 
August  1500 UTC (08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 16:00 London, 17:00 CEST).  A meeting 
notification with teleconference information has been sent separately.

Actions:

1.  Selecting Chair/Co-Chairs:  During today's meeting Chris Dillon and Rudi 
Vansnick volunteered to be co-chairs.  Please let us know if others would like 
to volunteer and/or support Chris and Rudi.

2.  Draft Charter: Staff will provide a draft charter for review by COB 
Tuesday, 13 August.  It will be posted in the wiki and in the Adobe Connect 
room for discussion at the meeting on 15 August. (DONE - attached)

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director