ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft PDP WG Charter

  • To: "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] RE: REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft PDP WG Charter
  • From: Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:36:18 +0200

Dear Chris,

As you said the document drafted by Julie is great and is not easy to improve. 
All is covered as far as I understand the principles of the duty of the draft 
team. It is up to the WG to elaborate responses to the given questions and 
issues. I would let the WG decide if they want to extend the 5 present models. 
It would require some investigation for us to define a sixth model, that 
perhaps was already discussed previously and was not withhold.

Interesting sample question ... a lot to discuss but isn't that the duty of the 
WG ? We are only the charter drafting team ... 

Till later today.

Rudi Vansnick
Chair NPOC Policy Committee - ICANN  - www.npoc.org

Mobile +32/(0)475/28.16.32 - Tel +32/(0)9/329.39.16
rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx


Op 22-aug.-2013, om 09:12 heeft "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx> het 
volgende geschreven:

> Dear colleagues,
>  
> Julie’s drafting is difficult to improve.
> However, I wonder if it would be good to have a line explicitly indicating 
> that the PDP WG will be free to modify the five alternatives in Section II, 
> effectively creating a sixth one which is recommended/preferred.
>  
> Beyond that my mind is starting to think about translation/transliteration 
> principles for the representation of contact details (rather than notes for 
> so many languages), but that is probably best left to the PDP WG. An example 
> of a principle might be the answer to the question “What happens if there is 
> more than one Romanization (transliteration) for a language in common use?”.
>  
> Looking forward to speaking later,
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Chris.
> --
> Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, 
> Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 
> 31599)ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon
>  
> From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
> Sent: 21 August 2013 20:05
> To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft PDP WG 
> Charter
> Importance: High
>  
> Dear members of the Charter Drafting Team,
>  
> This is a reminder that per our actions from our meeting that week, attached 
> you will find a revised draft charter for your review and for discussion at 
> our next meeting on Thursday, 22 August  1500 UTC (08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 
> 16:00 London, 17:00 CEST).  The changes are reflected as redlines.  This also 
> is posted on wiki at: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/22+August+2013. 
>  
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>  
> Best regards,
> Julie
>  
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>  

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy