Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

["Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Jim,

So far the commonly used term is "contact information" so we should
standardise on that.

As regards definitions, I notice that we aren't using the word
"transcribe", but it's probably best to leave it in the definitions
section for the time being.

I can't spot anything in the letters apart from what you have.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities,
UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon


On 30/01/2014 16:27, "James M. Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>I don¹t have any objections.  I have made a couple of editorial
>suggestions to these letters for your consideration.  The most notable
>thing I did was change ³contact data² to be ³contact information²
>wherever it appeared.  I feel we should be consistent with our
>terminology.  I¹m okay if you want to use something other than ³contact
>information².
>
>I have attached redlined documents for your review.
>
>Jim